首页> 外文会议>Image and Signal Processing for Remote Sensing XII >Comparison of Independent-Component-Analysis (ICA) Algorithms for GPR Detection of Non-Metallic Land Mines
【24h】

Comparison of Independent-Component-Analysis (ICA) Algorithms for GPR Detection of Non-Metallic Land Mines

机译:非金属地雷GPR检测中独立成分分析(ICA)算法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This paper deals with the detection of non-metallic anti-personnel (AP) land mines using stepped-frequency ground penetrating radar. A class of the so-called Independent Component Analysis (ICA) represents a powerful tool for such a detection. Various ICA algorithms have been introduces in the literature; therefore there is a need to compare these methods. In this contribution, four of the most common ICA methods are studied and compared to each other as regarding their ability to separate the target and clutter signals. These are the extended Infomax, the FastICA, the Joint Approximate Diagonalization of Eigenmatrices (JADE), and the Second Order Blind Identification (SOBI). The four algorithms have been applied to the same data set which has been collected using an SF-GPR. The area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve has been used to compare the clutter removal efficiency of the different algorithms. All four methods have given approximately consistent results. However both JADE and SOBI methods have shown better performances over Infomax and FastICA.
机译:本文涉及使用步进频率探地雷达探测非金属杀伤人员地雷。一类所谓的独立成分分析(ICA)代表了这种检测的强大工具。文献中已经介绍了各种ICA算法。因此需要比较这些方法。在此贡献中,研究了四种最常用的ICA方法,并将它们彼此分离,以区分目标信号和杂波信号。这些是扩展的Infomax,FastICA,本征矩阵的联合近似对角化(JADE)和二阶盲识别(SOBI)。四种算法已应用于使用SF-GPR收集的同一数据集。接收器工作特性(ROC)曲线下方的区域已用于比较不同算法的杂波去除效率。所有这四种方法都给出了大致一致的结果。但是,JADE和SOBI方法都显示出比Infomax和FastICA更好的性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号