【24h】

Comparing Bug Finding Tools with Reviews and Tests

机译:将Bug查找工具与评论和测试进行比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Bug finding tools can find defects in software source code using an automated static analysis. This automation may be able to reduce the time spent for other testing and review activities. For this we need to have a clear understanding of how the defects found by bug finding tools relate to the defects found by other techniques. This paper describes a case study using several projects mainly from an industrial environment that were used to analyse the interrelationships. The main finding is that the bug finding tools predominantly find different defects than testing but a subset of defects found by reviews. However, the types that can be detected are analysed more thoroughly. Therefore, a combination is most advisable if the high number of false positives of the tools can be tolerated.
机译:错误查找工具可以使用自动静态分析来查找软件源代码中的缺陷。这种自动化可以减少其他测试和审查活动所花费的时间。为此,我们需要对错误发现工具发现的缺陷与其他技术发现的缺陷之间的关系有一个清晰的了解。本文描述了一个案例研究,该案例研究主要使用来自工业环境的多个项目来分析相互关系。主要发现是,错误发现工具主要发现与测试不同的缺陷,但通过检查发现了一部分缺陷。但是,将更全面地分析可以检测到的类型。因此,如果可以容忍大量的工具误报,则最好组合使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号