首页> 外文会议>IEEE International Conference on Industry Applications >Comparative Study of Methods to Evaluate Three Phase Induction Motors Loading
【24h】

Comparative Study of Methods to Evaluate Three Phase Induction Motors Loading

机译:三相感应电动机负载评估方法的比较研究

获取原文

摘要

There are several methods for evaluating the loading condition of three phase induction motors (TPIMs). This evaluation allows inferring about the technical feasibility of replacing the motor in use by another one of less power, contributing to the efficient use of electric energy. The work presented in this document consisted of a comparative evaluation of the Linearization (LM) and Characteristic Curves (CCM) methods; as well as those used by the software BD Motor and MarkIV Plus. The results obtained with the application of the methods were compared with reference values, which were acquired through laboratory tests of the TPIM. In the laboratory tests, a computerized bench consisting of a TPIM and a dynamometer was used. Finally, the methods were compared to each other, leading to the conclusion that the method with the best precision is the CCM, followed by the current method used in MarkIV Plus software. However, the latter uses more accessible information than the required by the CCM.
机译:有几种方法可以评估三相感应电动机(TPIM)的负载情况。通过该评估,可以推断出用另一种功率较小的电动机代替使用中的电动机的技术可行性,从而有助于有效利用电能。本文档中的工作包括对线性化(LM)方法和特征曲线(CCM)方法的比较评估。以及软件BD Motor和MarkIV Plus使用的软件。将应用该方法获得的结果与参考值进行比较,这些参考值是通过TPIM的实验室测试获得的。在实验室测试中,使用了由TPIM和测力计组成的计算机化工作台。最后,将这两种方法进行了比较,得出的结论是,精度最高的方法是CCM,其次是MarkIV Plus软件中使用的当前方法。但是,后者使用的信息比CCM所需的信息更多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号