首页> 外文会议>IEEE Grenoble Power Tech >A comparison of distribution network planning solutions: Traditional reinforcement versus integration of distributed energy storage
【24h】

A comparison of distribution network planning solutions: Traditional reinforcement versus integration of distributed energy storage

机译:配电网络规划解决方案的比较:传统加固与分布式储能的集成

获取原文

摘要

Despite the radical changes that the electricity distribution system is currently facing and will have to face in the next decade, utilities still adopt a traditional approach for the expansion planning of their networks, based essentially on the fit and forget concept (only network reinforcements to cope with the worst case scenario). Although innovative solutions have been proposed in the last decade at the electricity distribution level (distributed energy storage, active management of distributed generation, demand side integration, etc.) and are becoming technically and economically feasible, they are not yet considered as viable planning alternatives. The reasons of this reluctance are the lack of ad hoc planning tools and business cases. In the paper, a novel planning tool for Active Distribution Networks is applied to a real MV distribution network of the A2A utility sited in the district of Brescia in order to prove the benefit of energy storage devices.
机译:尽管配电系统当前将面临并在未来十年中将面临巨大的变化,但公用事业公司仍然采用传统方法来进行其网络的扩展规划,这主要是基于“随取随用”的概念(只有通过网络加固才能应对)最坏的情况)。尽管在过去的十年中已经在配电级别上提出了创新的解决方案(分布式能源存储,分布式发电的主动管理,需求侧集成等),并且在技术和经济上都变得可行,但它们仍未被视为可行的计划替代方案。这种不情愿的原因是缺乏临时的计划工具和商业案例。在本文中,一种新颖的主动配电网络规划工具被应用于布雷西亚地区A2A公用事业公司的实际MV配电网络,以证明储能设备的优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号