【24h】

Combined Lower and Upper Bound Plastic Analysis: Better than the Sum of its Parts

机译:上限和下限组合塑性分析:优于零件总和

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Studies have shown that current bridge assessments are often overly conservative. In particular,rnengineers often use elastic analysis to predict the load at which a concrete slab bridge will fail inrnflexure and thus may grossly underestimate its ultimate capacity. This leads to bridges beingrnunnecessarily strengthened or even rebuilt, creating wasteful expense and unsustainable use ofrnresources.rnUpper bound plastic 'yield line' analysis is sometimes used to perform less conservativerncalculations, but it is difficult to apply to cases with complex geometry and engineers are oftenrnconcerned that the result may an unsafe overestimate of the collapse load. Modern computationalrnmethods enable automated lower bound analysis, which has been found to give good results but isrnstill not guaranteed to be accurate. This paper introduces the concept of 'combined lower and upperrnbound plastic analysis', in which the results of a lower bound analysis assist in generating an upperrnbound solution. The resulting close upper and lower bounds on the plastic collapse load prove thatrnthe maximum deviation from the theoretical exact solution is small.
机译:研究表明,当前的桥梁评估通常过于保守。尤其是,工程师经常使用弹性分析来预测混凝土平板桥在抗弯破坏时所承受的载荷,因此可能会严重低估其极限承载力。这导致桥梁被不必要地加固甚至重建,从而造成浪费的费用和对资源的不可持续使用。有时使用上限塑料“屈服线”分析进行保守性较低的计算,但很难应用于几何形状复杂的情况,并且工程师经常担心结果可能是不安全地高估了倒塌荷载。现代的计算方法可以实现自动化的下界分析,已发现该分析可以给出良好的结果,但仍不能保证其准确性。本文介绍了“上限和下限组合塑性分析”的概念,其中下限分析的结果有助于生成上限解。结果表明,塑性破坏荷载的上下限接近,证明与理论精确解的最大偏差很小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号