首页> 外文会议>Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control; Lecture Notes in Computer Science; 4416 >Comparing Forward and Backward Reachability as Tools for Safety Analysis
【24h】

Comparing Forward and Backward Reachability as Tools for Safety Analysis

机译:比较前后可达性作为安全性分析的工具

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Using only the existence and uniqueness of trajectories for a generic dynamic system with inputs, we define and examine eight types of forward and backward reachability constructs. If the input is treated in a worst-case fashion, any forward or backward reach set or tube can be used for safety analysis, but if the input is treated in a best-case fash-ion only the backward reach tube always provides the correct results. Fortunately, forward and backward algorithms can be exchanged if well-posed reverse time trajectories can be defined. Unfortunately, backward reachability constructs are more likely to suffer from numerical stabil-ity issues, especially in systems with significant contraction—the very systems where forward simulation and reachability are most effective.
机译:仅使用具有输入的通用动态系统的轨迹的存在和唯一性,我们定义并检查了八种类型的正向和反向可达性构造。如果以最坏的方式处理输入,则可以使用任何前伸或后伸的伸缩套件或电子管进行安全性分析,但是,如果以最好的方式对输入进行处理,则只有后伸的电子管始终可以提供正确的输入结果。幸运的是,如果可以定义正确的反向时间轨迹,则可以交换前向和后向算法。不幸的是,向后可到达性结构更容易遭受数值稳定性问题的困扰,尤其是在具有明显收缩的系统中(正向模拟和可到达性最有效的系统)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号