首页> 外文会议>Groupware: Design, Implementation, and Use >Understanding Methodological Differences to Study Convergence in Group Support System Sessions
【24h】

Understanding Methodological Differences to Study Convergence in Group Support System Sessions

机译:了解方法差异以研究小组支持系统会议中的融合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

While previous research has studied the process of group divergence extensively, little studies have been published regarding the process of group convergence. Therefore, this research answers a call for more research on group convergence to establish a better understanding of this critical group process. The goal of this study is to answer a methodological question: Does the idea set that a group processes during a convergence activity supported with a Group Support System have to be pre-defined or should it be generated by the group itself? The results of our lab experiment suggest that the results of the convergence process are not significantly affected by whether or not participants use pre-defined ideas or generate their own. This finding has implications for experimental design in collaboration research and participant selection and session design within organizations.
机译:尽管先前的研究已广泛研究了群体趋异的过程,但有关群体趋同过程的研究却很少发表。因此,这项研究要求对群体融合进行更多研究,以建立对这一关键群体过程的更好理解。这项研究的目的是回答一个方法论问题:这个想法是否设置为必须预先定义小组支持的融合活动期间的小组过程,还是应该由小组本身生成?我们实验室实验的结果表明,融合过程的结果不会因参与者是否使用预先定义的想法或产生自己的想法而受到显着影响。这一发现对协作研究中的实验设计以及组织内部的参与者选择和会话设计具有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号