首页> 外文会议>International conference on urban drainage >Monitoring Spatial and Temporal Changes in Stormwater Quality Through a Series of Treatment Trains. A case study – Golden Pond, Brisbane, Australia
【24h】

Monitoring Spatial and Temporal Changes in Stormwater Quality Through a Series of Treatment Trains. A case study – Golden Pond, Brisbane, Australia

机译:通过一系列处理列车监测雨水质量的时空变化。案例研究–澳大利亚布里斯班金池

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Urban stormwater can be a pollution source to waterways with impacts on aquatic ecosystemrnhealth. In urbanised residential areas major pollutants are sediment and nutrients and to arnlesser extent heavy metals and hydrocarbons. Stormwater best management practice is aimedrnat reducing potential downstream impacts. Stormwater treatment devices to control or reducerntrash, sediment and nutrients include gross pollutant traps (trash tracks, CDS and ECOSOLrnunits); sediment basins, vegetated buffer strips, wetlands and ponds and biofiltration systems.rnA crucial question is “How effective are these stormwater treatment devices in improvingrnwater quality?” A case study was undertaken to evaluate the performance of several devicesrnin a ‘treatment train’ including a sediment basin, constructed wetland, pond, CDS unit,rnECOSOL unit, natural riparian wetland and a 600 m length of natural stream channel. Ourrnstudy showed that during a storm event there was little reduction in the concentration of totalrnsuspended solids throughout the treatment train due to limited detention time, however therernwas a decrease in soluble nutrients. Within 24 hours TSS in stormwater runoff was atrnbackground concentrations or lower, but nutrient concentrations had increased. The sedimentrnbasin, wetland, pond and riparian vegetation were all effective in removing these nutrients.rnDuring dry weather small amounts of NH4 and NO3 were produced in the sediment basin butrnremoved in the wetland. Stormwater via the below ground GPT’s produced higher solublernnutrients, however these were removed by the pond and riparian wetland vegetation. Duringrndry weather the riparian wetland generated NH4 and organic particulates. The existing 600mrnnatural stream, lagoons and associated vegetation were effective at removing sediment andrnnutrients to achieve Water Quality Objectives of 15mg/L TSS, 0.65mg/L TN and 0.07mg/LrnTP, at the end of the treatment train.
机译:城市雨水可能是水道的污染源,对水生生态系统健康产生影响。在城市化的居民区,主要污染物是沉积物和营养物,而重金属和碳氢化合物的含量则更低。雨水最佳管理实践旨在减少潜在的下游影响。用于控制或减少垃圾,沉积物和养分的雨水处理设备包括总污染物阱(垃圾道,CDS和ECOSOLnunits);沉积盆地,植被缓冲带,湿地和池塘以及生物过滤系统。一个关键问题是“这些雨水处理装置在改善水质方面有多有效?”进行了案例研究,以评估“处理系列”中几种设备的性能,包括沉积池,人工湿地,池塘,CDS单元,ECOSOL单元,天然河岸湿地和600 m的天然河道长度。我们的研究表明,在暴风雨事件中,由于滞留时间有限,整个治疗过程中总悬浮固体的浓度几乎没有减少,但是可溶性养分却减少了。在24小时内,雨水径流中的TSS处于背景浓度或更低,但营养物浓度增加。沉积盆地,湿地,池塘和河岸植被均能有效去除这些养分。在干旱天气下,在湿地中去除的沉积物池中会产生少量的NH4和NO3。 GPT地下的雨水产生了较高的可溶性营养素,但是这些营养素却被池塘和河岸湿地植被清除了。在干旱天气中,河岸湿地产生了NH4和有机颗粒。在处理过程结束时,现有的600毫米天然水流,泻湖和相关的植被可有效去除沉积物和营养素,以达到15mg / L TSS,0.65mg / L TN和0.07mg / LrnTP的水质目标。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 会议地点 Portland OR(US)
  • 作者单位

    School of Environmental Engineering and Co-operative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, GriffithUniversity, Brisbane, Australia 4111, Email: M.Greenway@mailbox.gu.edu.au;

    School of Environmental Engineering and Co-operative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, GriffithUniversity, Brisbane, Australia 4111;

    School of Environmental Engineering and Co-operative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, GriffithUniversity, Brisbane, Australia 4111;

  • 会议组织
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 排水方法;陆地水文学、水文地理学(水象学);
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号