首页> 外文会议>GeoShanghai International Conference; 20060606-08; Shanghai(CN) >Investigation of False Positives in Database of Liquefaction Assessment Procedure based on Shear Wave Velocity
【24h】

Investigation of False Positives in Database of Liquefaction Assessment Procedure based on Shear Wave Velocity

机译:基于剪切波速度的液化评估程序数据库中的误报调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The simplified liquefaction assessment procedure based on shear wave velocity is frequently used for liquefaction potential evaluation. However, a large number of false positives (no liquefaction detected when the V_(s1)-CSR combination indicated that it should have been) in the database on which the simplified procedure was based are a major concern for its reliability. Although some of the false positives might be explained by the presence of a thick surface layer that masks the occurrence of liquefaction, many of them cannot. Theoretical CRR_(field)-V_(s1) combinations for silty sands containing 0 to 15 percent non-plastic fines further confirmed that the existence of false positives is predictable. An important factor is that the liquefaction potential may be more closely related to the medium-to-large strain shear modulus for sands with non-plastic fines, which is not reflected by the shear wave velocity measurement alone. The simplified procedure based on the CPT penetration resistance or SPT blow counts should be more reliable.
机译:基于剪切波速度的简化液化评估程序通常用于液化潜力评估。但是,简化程序所基于的数据库中存在大量误报(当V_(s1)-CSR组合表明应有液化时未检测到液化)是其可靠性的主要问题。尽管某些误报可能由掩盖液化发生的厚表层的存在来解释,但其中许多不能。含0%到15%的非塑性细粉的粉砂的理论CRR_(field)-V_(s1)组合进一步证实了假阳性的存在是可以预测的。一个重要的因素是,液化电位可能与具有非塑性细料的砂的中到大应变剪切模量更紧密相关,而这不能仅通过剪切波速度测量就可以反映出来。基于CPT穿透阻力或SPT打击次数的简化程序应该更可靠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号