首页> 外文会议>GeoShanghai International Conference; 20060606-08; Shanghai(CN) >Comparison of Surface-Wave Techniques in the Spatial Profiling of Subsurface Stiffness
【24h】

Comparison of Surface-Wave Techniques in the Spatial Profiling of Subsurface Stiffness

机译:地下刚度空间剖面中的表面波技术比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The discrepancy among results of various surface-wave tests is reported. In Korea, universities and industries collaborated to compare the reliability of surface waves including the Spectral-Analysis-of-Surface-Waves (SASW) method, the Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) method, the Harmonic Wavelet Analysis of Waves method (HWAW) and the Refraction Microtremor (ReMi) method at a given geological site. The resulting shear-wave velocity profiles were compared with borehole seismic test results. Also, the stratification evaluated by surface-wave tests is compared with the stratification by borehole logs and SPT-N values. The distinct difference between the SASW and the MASW methods was identified in the depth resolution of the 1-D shear wave velocity and in the accuracy of the 2-D spatial profiling of subsurface stiffness. The effects of seismic source, the sensitivity of sensors and the forward modeling theory are discussed to explain the discrepancy between the SASW method and the MASW method.
机译:报告了各种表面波测试结果之间的差异。在韩国,大学和工业界进行了合作,以比较表面波的可靠性,包括表面波频谱分析(SASW)方法,表面波多通道分析(MASW)方法,谐波小波分析方法(HWAW) )和指定地质位置的折射微震(ReMi)方法。将所得的剪切波速度剖面与井眼地震测试结果进行比较。同样,将通过表面波测试评估的分层与通过井眼测井和SPT-N值的分层进行比较。 SASW和MASW方法之间的明显区别在于一维剪切波速度的深度分辨率和地下刚度的二维空间分布精度。讨论了地震源,传感器灵敏度和正演模拟理论的影响,以解释SASW方法与MASW方法之间的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号