首页> 外文会议>Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference(GECCO 2004) pt.1; 20040626-630; Seattle,WA(US) >A Comparison of Several Algorithms and Representations for Single Objective Optimization
【24h】

A Comparison of Several Algorithms and Representations for Single Objective Optimization

机译:单目标优化的几种算法和表示形式的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this paper we perform two experiments. In the first experiment we analyze the convergence ability to using different base for encoding solutions. For this purpose we use the bases 2 to 16. We apply the same algorithm (with the same basic parameters) for all considered bases of representation and for all considered test functions. The algorithm is an (1+1) ES. In the second experiment we will perform a comparison between three algorithms which use different bases for solution representation. Each of these algorithms uses a dynamic representation of the solutions in the sense that the representation is not fixed and is changed during the search process. The difference between these algorithms consists in the technique adopted for changing the base over which the solution is represented. These algorithms are: Adaptive Representation Evolutionary Algorithms (AREA), Dynamic Representation Evolution Strategy (DRES) and Seasonal Model Evolution Strategy (SMES).
机译:在本文中,我们进行了两个实验。在第一个实验中,我们分析了使用不同基础进行编码的收敛能力。为此,我们使用2到16的基数。我们对所有考虑的表示基础和所有考虑的测试函数应用相同的算法(具有相同的基本参数)。该算法是(1 + 1)ES。在第二个实验中,我们将对三种使用不同基础表示解决方案的算法进行比较。从某种意义上说,表示形式不是固定的,而是在搜索过程中更改的,从某种意义上说,这些算法都使用解决方案的动态表示形式。这些算法之间的差异在于所采用的更改代表解决方案的基础的技术。这些算法是:自适应表示进化算法(AREA),动态表示进化策略(DRES)和季节性模型进化策略(SMES)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号