首页> 外文会议>Fuel Cell Seminar 2013 >Fuel cells and flow batteries: a comparative process and design analysis
【24h】

Fuel cells and flow batteries: a comparative process and design analysis

机译:燃料电池和液流电池:比较过程和设计分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The energy industry needs an increase of efficiency of energy conversion and inexpensive energy storage. Electrochemical flow processes, such as fuel cells, flow batteries and electrolysers, could become key technologies in our energy future. The increasing amount of fluctuating renewable electric power generation needs the installation of electric storage. Hydrogen economy might be one solution involving fuel cells and electrolyzer, but classic secondary batteries as batch processes have size and cost limitations. The development of flow batteries changed the process of classic design of electrochemical batch process for storing electricity to a flow process like a fuel cell. For further development and a future research strategy it is important to understand their similarities and synergies to fuel cells and electrolyzer. A process and design analysis allows identifying similarities and differences between fuel cells and flow batteries. Electrolyzer also can be discussed. A thermodynamic consideration shows that the reaction coordinate (fuel utilization or state of charge (SoQ) of fuel cells and flow batteries is a function of space. SoC of secondary batteries is a function of time because they are batch processes. Flow processes generally allow high energy storage by its reaction products that can be stored independently from their stack design. A comparison of the major design criteria, as kind of process, BoP needs, ionic transport in membranes, substance transport, operation conditions, transformation of electrodes, reaction progress, comparison open system and closed system etc. shows a number of similarities between fuel cells and flow batteries. Only the energy storage by ionic substances in flow batteries differs clearly from energy storage by reaction enthalpy of electrical neutral substances in fuel cells. The storage of sufficient electric work in a certain volume or mass still remains a problem. This may be the use of high pressure with the necessary pressure vessels or heavy metallic hydrates for storing hydrogen or the use of strongly diluting supporting electrolytes for flow batteries. For that reason it is important to identify the quality of energy storage in an early state of design. A new method allows a very early and simple evaluation of the future technical feasibility of electrochemical processes as fuel cells or flow batteries for electricity storage.
机译:能源工业需要提高能量转换效率和廉价的能量存储。燃料电池,液流电池和电解槽等电化学流动过程可能成为我们未来能源的关键技术。波动的可再生发电量的增加需要安装蓄电装置。氢经济可能是涉及燃料电池和电解槽的一种解决方案,但是传统的二次电池由于分批处理而受到尺寸和成本的限制。液流电池的发展改变了传统的电化学批处理设计流程,即电化学分批处理过程将电能存储到燃料电池等液流过程中。对于进一步的发展和未来的研究策略,重要的是要了解它们与燃料电池和电解槽的相似性和协同作用。通过过程和设计分析,可以确定燃料电池和液流电池之间的异同。电解槽也可以讨论。热力学考虑表明,燃料电池和液流电池的反应坐标(燃料利用率或充电状态(SoQ)是空间的函数。二次电池的SoC是时间的函数,因为它们是批处理过程。通过其反应产物进行能量存储,反应产物可以独立于叠层设计进行存储,主要设计标准的比较,如工艺,BoP需求,膜中的离子迁移,物质迁移,操作条件,电极转变,反应进度,比较开放系统和封闭系统等显示了燃料电池和液流电池之间的许多相似之处,只有液流电池中离子物质的能量存储与燃料电池中电中性物质的反应焓的能量存储明显不同。一定体积或质量的电功仍然存在问题。这可能是由于高压必要的压力容器或重金属水合物,用于存储氢,或将强稀释的辅助电解质用于液流电池。因此,在设计的早期阶段确定能量存储的质量非常重要。一种新方法可以非常早期和简单地评估电化学工艺作为燃料电池或液流电池的未来技术可行性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号