首页> 外文会议>Explo 2011 >Non-Ideal Shock Energy Factor versus Powder Factor for Open Pit Blast Design - ANFO and Chemically-Sensitised Emulsion
【24h】

Non-Ideal Shock Energy Factor versus Powder Factor for Open Pit Blast Design - ANFO and Chemically-Sensitised Emulsion

机译:露天矿爆破设计的非理想冲击能量因数与粉末因数-ANFO和化学增感乳液

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper proposes an approach to determine the influence of non-ideal detonation characteristics related to the charge diameter, explosive type and confinement conditions on the available shock energy of ANFO and a representative chemically-sensitised (gassed) emulsion. The proposed degrees of non-ideality of the two different blasting agents are indicated by the Gurney ratios, determined from existing cylinder expansion testing data. The influence of the non-ideal detonation properties on blast design and performance are also compared using a series of theoretical, equal powder factor open pit blasting patterns with hole diameters ranging from 102 mm to 270 mm. The non-ideal shock energy factor (NSEF), which is the available shock energy per tonne of blasted material (MJ/t), is used to compare the different blasting patterns as charged with either ANFO or the gassed emulsion of equal charge density (0.85 g/cm3). The intended purpose of this investigation is to provide explosive users with an approach to compare different explosive types or charge diameters in the absence of dedicated non-ideal detonation modelling, which is generally not available to explosives users. The results of the comparisons suggest that at low charge densities, the example gassed emulsion displays a higher velocity of detonation (VOD) than ANFO in smaller charge diameters but similar degrees of non-ideality (based on proposed Gurney ratios). The results also suggest that the confined, non-ideal gassed emulsion VOD at hole diameters greater than 270 mm can be less than ANFO due to the low density effects on the emulsion matrix. The differences in non-ideal detonation properties and Gurney ratios between the ANFO and gassed emulsion resulted in gassed emulsion NSEF values ranging from 15 per cent lower to 65 per cent higher than ANFO for equal powder-factor patterns in blasthole diameters from 102 mm to 270 mm.
机译:本文提出了一种确定与装药直径,炸药类型和限制条件有关的非理想爆震特性对ANFO和典型的化学敏化(气化)乳液的可用冲击能的影响的方法。两种不同炸药的建议不理想程度由格尼比表示,该比由现有的气缸膨胀测试数据确定。还使用一系列理论上相同的粉末直径开孔爆破方式(孔径为102 mm至270 mm)比较了非理想爆震性能对喷砂设计和性能的影响。非理想冲击能量因数(NSEF)是每吨喷砂材料的可用冲击能量(MJ / t),用于比较装填有ANFO或等电荷密度的充气乳化液的不同喷砂方式( 0.85 g / cm3)。这项调查的目的是为炸药使用者提供一种在没有专门的非理想爆炸模型的情况下比较不同炸药类型或装药直径的方法,而炸药使用者通常无法获得这种模型。比较的结果表明,在较小的装料直径下,与较小的装料直径相比,示例充气气体乳液在爆破速度(VOD)上比ANFO更高,但具有不理想的程度(基于建议的葛尼比)。结果还表明,由于对乳液基质的低密度影响,孔径大于270 mm的密闭,非理想的充气乳液VOD可以小于ANFO。对于爆炸孔直径从102 mm到270的相等粉末因子模式,ANFO和充气乳剂之间的非理想爆震特性和格尼比率的差异导致充气乳剂的NSEF值比ANFO低15%至65%。毫米

著录项

  • 来源
    《Explo 2011》|2011年|p.43-48|共6页
  • 会议地点 Melbourne(AU)
  • 作者

    K G Fleetwood; E Villaescusa;

  • 作者单位

    Western Australian School of Mines, Department of Mining Engineering and Surveying, Locked Bag 30, Kalgoorlie WA 6430;

    Western Australian School of Mines, Department of Mining Engineering and Surveying, Locked Bag 30, Kalgoorlie WA 6430;

  • 会议组织
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 爆破技术;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号