首页> 外文会议>European biomass conference >THE IGNITABILITY (EXPLOSION GROUP CLASSIFICATION) OF VARIOUS PRODUCER GAS COMPOSITIONS
【24h】

THE IGNITABILITY (EXPLOSION GROUP CLASSIFICATION) OF VARIOUS PRODUCER GAS COMPOSITIONS

机译:各种生产者气体成分的可燃性(爆炸组分类)

获取原文

摘要

Biomass gasification represents one of the most promising and effective methods to cover future energy demands. However the construction and the operation of a biomass gasification plant often involves difficulties. On the one hand the feed should have a stable and uniform composition to assure a certain quality of the producer gas. On the other hand there are explosion protection requirements because explosive gas/air mixtures may occur. Design features based on explosion protection requirements may be expensive and are prone to create problems during operation. E.g. the small gaps of a flame arrester may be to blocked partly or completely. Moreover additional maintenance and downtime could appear. The explosion protection measures used are based on the so called Maximum Experimental Safe Gap (MESG). Flammable gases and vapours (producer gases) as well as explosion proof equipment are classified into the explosion groups IIA, IIB, IIC based on MESG values (group I is for mining) . The MESG is determined according to standard IEC 60079-20-1. The MESG of most of the pure flammable gases is well known. Because of the wide range of the producer gas composition the determination of each MESG is not appropriate. Therefore, it is good practice to base the safety requirements of current wood gas plants on the compound having the lowest MESG. Doing so the inert gas amounts are ignored entirely. Thus, some wood gas plants are likely to be designed too conservative resulting in flame arrester equipment that causes additional difficulties during operation. Based on a calculation method [formula 2] by PTB [1] further investigations have been done. This current calculation method has been extended to take into account the inert gases amounts. As a result of comparative studies of calculated MESG and measured MESG it has been verified that the classification of some existing producer gases is definitely too conservative. Furthermore, depending on the oxidant used during the gasification process even wood gas classified as IIA seems to be possiblegasification possible.
机译:生物质气化是满足未来能源需求的最有希望和最有效的方法之一。然而,生物质气化装置的建造和操作通常涉及困难。一方面,进料应具有稳定且均匀的组成,以确保一定质量的生产气。另一方面,存在爆炸防护要求,因为可能会发生爆炸性气体/空气混合物。基于防爆要求的设计功能可能很昂贵,并且在操作过程中容易产生问题。例如。阻火器的小缝隙可能会部分或完全堵塞。此外,可能还会出现其他维护和停机时间。所使用的防爆措施基于所谓的最大实验安全间隙(MESG)。基于MESG值将易燃气体和蒸气(生产气体)以及防爆设备分为IIA,IIB,IIC爆炸组(I组用于采矿)。根据标准IEC 60079-20-1确定MESG。大多数纯可燃气体的MESG是众所周知的。由于生产气体组成的范围很广,因此每种MESG的测定都是不合适的。因此,优良作法是将现有的木材煤气厂的安全要求基于具有最低MESG的化合物。这样做完全忽略了惰性气体量。因此,某些木气厂的设计可能过于保守,从而导致阻火器设备在运行过程中造成额外的困难。基于PTB [1]的计算方法[公式2],已经进行了进一步的研究。当前的计算方法已扩展到考虑惰性气体的量。通过对计算出的MESG和测得的MESG进行比较研究的结果,已证实某些现有生产气体的分类绝对过于保守。此外,取决于气化过程中使用的氧化剂,甚至被分类为IIA的木质气体似乎也可能被气化。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 会议地点 Lyon(FR)
  • 作者单位

    MCI – University of Applied Sciences for Environmental- Process- and Biotechnology Innsbruck Austria marcel.huber@mci.edu;

    MCI – University of Applied Sciences for Environmental- Process- and Biotechnology Innsbruck Austria;

    SynCraft Engineering Schwaz Austria;

    Physikalisch-Technische-Bundesanstalt (PTB) Braunschweig Germany;

  • 会议组织
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-26 14:40:17

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号