首页> 外文会议>Euro PM2007 >Various Methods to Assess the Degree of Sintering: a Review
【24h】

Various Methods to Assess the Degree of Sintering: a Review

机译:评估烧结度的各种方法:综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The end users of PM parts, to ensure the fulfilment of most common application requirements, relyrnon standards issued by different bodies. These standards specify the material’s propertiesrncurrently achieved by usual industrial processes of powder metallurgy. In some cases, however,rneven if the properties of PM parts supplied by different manufacturers fulfil the specifications, andrnthe raw materials are the same, operating failures occur only for some parts. Therefore, somernuncontrolled factor, or property, not yet included in the standards, should justify the observedrndifferences. This “unspecified” factor is the degree of sintering, as characterised not only byrnprocess conditions and corresponding typical mechanical properties. The intensity of the process,rnand the consequent "mesostructure", namely the combined pattern of porosity feature, microconstituentsrntype and distribution, and diffusion level of alloy additions, may be the reason of thernbehaviour's difference, for instance in case of Hertzian contact pressures. On this ground, after anrnapproach to sintering based on the well-known Larson-Miller criterion, other methods, presumablyrnmore suited to differentiate the effect of sintering on material's mesostructure, and performance asrnwell, are reviewed. A survey of existing literature enables to compare the points of strength andrnweakness of different methods proposed to rate the effect of sintering on the whole of materialrnproperties. This approach completes and integrates the Larson-Miller criterion, which appearsrnmore suitable to characterise the process, than the effects of the process, on performances ofrnsintered materials subject to different and heavily demanding stress pattern.
机译:PM零件的最终用户,以确保满足最常见的应用要求,即由不同机构发布的标准。这些标准规定了通过粉末冶金的常规工业过程当前可获得的材料性能。但是,在某些情况下,即使不同制造商提供的PM零件的性能满足规格,并且原材料相同,也仅会在某些零件上发生操作故障。因此,标准中尚未包括的一些不受控制的因素或特性应证明所观察到的差异是合理的。该“未指定”因素是烧结程度,不仅通过工艺条件和相应的典型机械性能来表征。过程的强度和随之而来的“介观结构”,即孔隙特征,微成分的类型和分布以及合金添加物的扩散水平的组合模式,可能是行为差异的原因,例如在赫兹接触压力的情况下。因此,在根据众所周知的Larson-Miller准则对烧结进行了研究之后,对可能更适于区分烧结对材料介观结构和性能的影响的其他方法进行了综述。现有文献的调查可以比较提议评估烧结对整个材料性能的影响的不同方法的强度和弱点。这种方法完成并整合了Larson-Miller准则,该准则似乎比过程的影响更适合表征过程对烧结材料在不同应力模式下的性能的要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号