【24h】

Evaluating Capping Alternatives for an Arctic Landfill

机译:评估北极垃圾填埋场的封盖替代方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper presents an evaluation of capping alternatives for an 18.2 hectare landfill located in Barrow, Alaska. When closure planning for the Barrow Landfill began, excavation and removal or treatment of wastes was included in the initial evaluation of potential closure options. However, due to Barrow's remote location and the high costs of waste excavation, transportation, and/or incineration, capping was identified as the most cost-effective closure method. Three general types of caps were evaluated in a comparative analysis, including a freezeback cap, silt cap, and a composite soil/geomembrane cap. A numerical selection process introduced by Peggs and Thiel was used for rating and selecting a specific geomembrane. Cold weather shear testing results for Linear Low Density Polyethylene (LLDPE) and Polypropylene (PP) are presented. Based on the evaluation process and the cold weather testing of geomembrane samples, the recommended capping alternative was a buried PP geomembrane.
机译:本文介绍了对位于阿拉斯加巴罗的18.2公顷垃圾填埋场的封顶替代方案的评估。当巴罗垃圾填埋场的封闭计划开始时,对潜在封闭方案的初步评估中包括挖掘和清除或处理废物。但是,由于巴罗(Barrow)的位置偏远以及废物挖掘,运输和/或焚化的高成本,封盖被认为是最具成本效益的封闭方法。在比较分析中评估了三种一般类型的盖,包括反冲盖,淤泥盖和复合土/土工膜盖。 Peggs和Thiel引入的数值选择过程用于评估和选择特定的土工膜。给出了线性低密度聚乙烯(LLDPE)和聚丙烯(PP)的寒冷天气剪切测试结果。根据评估过程和土工膜样品的寒冷天气测试,推荐的封盖替代方案是埋入PP土工膜。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号