首页> 外文会议>Digital fabrication 2011 : Technical programs and proceedings >Carbon Footprint Analysis Comparing a Digital Frame to Printed Photos
【24h】

Carbon Footprint Analysis Comparing a Digital Frame to Printed Photos

机译:碳足迹分析比较数码相框和打印的照片

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Electronic digital photo frames provide a convenient, aesthetically pleasing way for consumers to display several photos in a small space. Though convenient, these displays require continuous electrical input during operation while printed photos rely on reflected ambient light for viewing. To understand the relative environmental impact of both photo display options, a carbon footprint analysis was performed comparing a digital frame over its expected lifespan with 4" x 6" photos printed in album format on a HP printer. We find that operating an average digital frame displaying 200 photos at 44 hours per week for 2 years has a carbon footprint greater than 6 times that of a 200-photo album printed on a HP OfficeJet 6500 All-in-One printer. For the OfficeJet-printed photos the printer bill of materials, photo album materials, and energy consumption all contribute similarly to the carbon footprint. In the case of the digital frame, energy impacts from the usage model are critical for determining the overall impact. In this paper we present our carbon footprint model, the underlying assumptions, and a sensitivity analysis of the results.
机译:电子数码相框为消费者提供了一种在美学上令人愉悦的便捷方式,可以在狭小的空间中显示多张照片。这些显示器虽然方便,但在操作过程中需要连续的电输入,而打印的照片则依靠反射的环境光进行观看。为了了解这两种照片显示选件的相对环境影响,我们进行了碳足迹分析,将数码相框在其预期寿命内与在HP打印机上以相册格式打印的4“ x 6”照片进行了比较。我们发现,使用平均数码相框每周显示44张200张照片,持续2年,其碳足迹要比使用HP OfficeJet 6500多合一打印机打印200张相册的碳足迹大6倍。对于OfficeJet打印的照片,打印机的材料清单,相册材料和能耗都对碳足迹有类似的影响。在数字框架的情况下,使用模型产生的能量影响对于确定总体影响至关重要。在本文中,我们介绍了我们的碳足迹模型,基本假设以及结果的敏感性分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号