首页> 外文会议>NASTT's No-Dig Show 2018 - Full Conference Proceedings >Competitive Tendering of Alternative Sewer Rehabilitation Technologies for Large Diameter and Non-Circular Applications
【24h】

Competitive Tendering of Alternative Sewer Rehabilitation Technologies for Large Diameter and Non-Circular Applications

机译:大口径和非圆形应用的替代污水修复技术的竞争性招标

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In recent years there has been increased pressure for utilization of sewer rehabilitation technologies beyond traditional Cured-In-Place-Pipe (CIPP) and Glass Reinforced Polymer (GRP) segmental lining for large diameter and non-circular applications. This has included technologies such as Centrifugally Cast Concrete Pipe (CCCP), spiral wound PVC strip lining, bonded FRP liners and others. Radically different levels of product maturity, varying design approaches and quality assurance requirements often make direct comparison between many technologies complex. This paper reviews issues associated with alternative rehabilitation technologies and presents an approach previously utilized by the authors to tender large diameter and non-circular sewer rehabilitation projects with multiple sewer rehabilitation methods in a competitive yet equitable manner.Traditional CIPP and GRP lining technologies have mature and widely accepted design and Quality Assurance (QA) procedures (ASTM F1216, WRc IGN No. 4-34) in addition to a long term proven performance record. The industry standards governing CIPP and GRP liner installations create a relatively straightforward tendering process for procurement and direct comparison of cost. Alternative rehabilitation methods, including: CCCP and spiral wound PVC strip liners have some successful performance history; however, there are less proscriptive and universally accepted design, installation, and QA standards for the technologies. Thus, conventional tendering requires more detailed and relatively proscriptive specifications to ensure that design intent is achieved in the construction phase and for meaningful direct comparison of bid costs.This paper reviews steps the authors have taken to tender alternative rehabilitation methods in a competitive, equitable manner as illustrated through a case study. The case study reviews a project in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, involving the rehabilitation of two large non-circular sewers; 1800x1350 (72”x54”) and 2700x1800 (108”x72”) eggs in various states of deterioration.
机译:近年来,在大直径和非圆形应用中,使用下水道修复技术的压力已经超过传统的就地管道(CIPP)和玻璃纤维增​​强聚合物(GRP)分段衬砌。其中包括诸如离心浇铸混凝土管(CCCP),螺旋缠绕PVC带衬里,粘结FRP衬里等技术。根本不同的产品成熟度水平,不同的设计方法和质量保证要求通常会使许多技术之间的直接比较变得复杂。本文回顾了与替代修复技术有关的问题,并提出了作者以前使用的一种方法,以竞争而公平的方式招标采用多种下水道修复方法来招标大直径和非圆形下水道修复项目。\ r \ n传统的CIPP和GRP衬砌技术除了已证明的长期性能记录外,还具有成熟且被广泛接受的设计和质量保证(QA)程序(ASTM F1216,WRc IGN第4-34号)。管理CIPP和GRP衬管安装的行业标准为采购和成本的直接比较创建了一个相对简单的招标过程。替代的康复方法包括:CCCP和螺旋缠绕PVC条衬有成功的使用历史;但是,该技术的说明性和通用性较低的设计,安装和质量保证标准较少。因此,常规招标需要更详细和相对规定性的规范,以确保在施工阶段达到设计意图并有意义地直接比较投标成本。\ r \ n本文回顾了作者为在竞争中进行招标而采用的其他修复方法的步骤。 ,如案例研究所示。案例研究回顾了加拿大曼尼托巴省温尼伯的一个项目,该项目涉及修复两个大型非圆形下水道;处于各种退化状态的1800x1350(72“ x54”)和2700x1800(108“ x72”)鸡蛋。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号