首页> 外文会议>Dam safty 2003 >'?Would I Want to Live in That House?' A Case Study in Cost Effective Hazard Classifications
【24h】

'?Would I Want to Live in That House?' A Case Study in Cost Effective Hazard Classifications

机译:“我想住在那栋房子里吗?”经济有效的危害分类案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. (GZA) has been retained for engineering services to rnassign downstream hazard potential classifications using engineering judgment for selected rndams throughout Rhode Island. The work was completed under a Federal Emergency rnManagement Agency (FEMA) Dam Safety Grant for the Rhode Island Department of rnEnvironmental Management, Office of Compliance and Inspection (RIDEM). Many of the rnRIDEM files for the subset of 68 dams selected for the project did not contain supporting rninformation regarding their hazard classification. In many cases, when a hazard potential rnclassification did not exist, the dam was classified as ?Low? by default. RIDEM established rndam hazard classifications depending upon whether or not the failure of the dam would: (a) rnlikely cause the loss of life (High Hazard); (b) disrupt lifeline resources such as major rntransportation thoroughfares and/or result in major economic losses (Significant Hazard); or ? rnresult in only the loss of the dam owner?s property and/or result in low economic losses (Low rnHazard). Up-to-date Hazard potential classifications were assigned to the selected dams rnthrough a combination of preliminary hydraulic analysis of the hypothetical dam breach flood rnwave, downstream floodplain site reconnaissance of dams and potential downstream impact rnareas, GIS mapping, and professional judgment. The cost-effective hazard classification rnapproach developed involved a more consistent, objective, and systematic engineering rnapproach to evaluating dam hazard classifications than typically employed by RIDEM in the rnpast. As a result, the existing hazard classification distribution of 36 Low, 30 Significant, and 2 rnHigh Hazard dams was updated to 13 Low, 21 Significant, and 34 High Hazard dams. rnUpdated classifications will provide direction for the Rhode Island Dam Safety Program?s rnresources, including performance of inspections, repair requirements, and determining unsafe rndams. The program is also in the process of developing regulations to strengthen its ability to rnaccomplish such.
机译:GZA GeoEnvironmental,Inc.(GZA)被保留用于工程服务,以便根据工程判断对整个罗德岛的特定坝进行下游危险潜在分类。该工作是在罗得岛州合规与检查办公室(RIDEM)环境管理部门的联邦紧急事务管理机构(FEMA)大坝安全补助金下完成的。为该项目选择的68个水坝的子集的许多rnRIDEM文件没有包含有关其危害分类的rnn信息。在许多情况下,当不存在潜在危险等级时,大坝被分类为“低”。默认。 RIDEM根据大坝的故障是否会导致大坝危险分类:(a)可能造成生命损失(高危险); (b)破坏生命线资源,例如主要的交通运输通道和/或造成重大的经济损失(重大危险);要么 ?仅造成大坝所有者财产的损失和/或导致较低的经济损失(低危害)。通过对假设的大坝溃决洪水进行初步的水力分析,对大坝的下游洪泛区现场勘察和潜在的下游冲击风险,GIS测绘和专业判断相结合,为选定的大坝分配了最新的潜在危害分类。与RIDEM在通常情况下通常采用的方法相比,开发的具有成本效益的灾害分类方法涉及到更一致,客观,系统的工程大坝方法来评估大坝灾害分类。结果,将现有的36个低,30个重要和2个高危害大坝的危险分类分布更新为13个低,21个重要和34个高危害大坝。更新的分类将为罗德岛大坝安全计划的资源提供指导,包括检查,维修要求和确定不安全的水坝。该计划也正在制定法规以增强其完成这些功能的能力。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Dam safty 2003》|2003年|1-8|共8页
  • 会议地点 Minneapolis MN(US)
  • 作者单位

    GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc., One Edgewater Drive, Norwood, MA 02062, rn781-278-5788,dmleone@gza.com;

    GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc., One Edgewater Drive, Norwood, MA 02062, rn781-278-5788, pbaril@gza.com;

    State of Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management, 235 rnPromenade Street, Suite 220, Providence, RI 02908, 401-222-1360 x7122, rnpgugliel@dem.state.ri.us;

  • 会议组织
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 挡水坝;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-26 14:25:08

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号