首页> 外文会议>Conference on Visualization, Image-Guided Procedures, and Display: Medical Imaging 2004; 20040215-20040217; San Diego,CA; US >Comparison between skin mounted fiducials and bone implanted fiducials for image-guided neurosurgery
【24h】

Comparison between skin mounted fiducials and bone implanted fiducials for image-guided neurosurgery

机译:图像引导神经外科皮肤固定基准与骨植入基准之间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Point-based registration for image-guided neurosurgery has become the industry standard. While the use of intrinsic points is appealing because of its retrospective nature, affixing extrinsic objects to the head prior to scanning has been demonstrated to provide much more accurate registrations. Points of reference between image space and physical space are called fiducials. The extrinsic objects which generate those points are fiducial markers. The markers can be broken down into two classifications: skin-mounted and bone-implanted. Each has distinct advantages and disadvantages. Skin-mounted fiducials require simply sticking them on the patient in locations suggested by the manufacturer, however, they can move with tractions placed on the skin, fall off and perhaps the most dangerous problem, they can be replaced by the patient. Bone implanted markers being rigidly affixed to the skull do not present such problems. However, a minor surgical intervention (analogous to dental work) must be performed to implant the markers prior to surgery. Therefore marker type and use has become a decision point for image-guided surgery. We have performed a series of experiments in an attempt to better quantify aspects of the two types of markers so mat better informed decisions can be made. We have created a phantom composed of a full-size plastic skull [Wards Scientific Supply] with a 500 ml bag of saline placed in the brain cavity. The skull was then sealed. A skin mimicking material, DragonSkin~(TM) [SmoothOn Company] was painted onto the surface and allowed to dry. Skin mounted fiducials [Medtronic-SNT] and bone-implanted markers [Z-Kat]were placed on the phantom. In addition, three additional bone-implanted markers were placed (two on the base of the skull and one in the eye socket for use as targets). The markers were imaged in CT and 4 MRI sequences (T1-weighted, T2 weighted, SPGR, and a functional series.) The markers were also located in physical space using an Optotrak 3020 [Northern Digital Inc]. Registrations between image space and physical space were performed and fiducial and target registration errors were determined. Finally the 5 bone-implanted makers which penetrated the skin were removed and a traction equivalent to 25% of the weight of the average human head was applied to the "skin" surface. Target and fiducial registrations were again performed.
机译:基于点的图像引导神经外科注册已成为行业标准。尽管使用固有点具有追溯力,因此吸引人,但已证明在扫描之前将外部物体固定到头部可以提供更准确的配准。图像空间和物理空间之间的参考点称为基准点。产生这些点的外部物体是基准标记。标记可分为两类:皮肤固定和骨植入。每种都有各自的优点和缺点。安装在皮肤上的基准点只需将其粘贴在制造商建议的位置上的患者身上即可,但是,它们可以在皮肤上施加牵引力的情况下移动,掉落,并且可能是最危险的问题,可以由患者替换。牢固地固定在颅骨上的骨植入标记物不会出现此类问题。但是,在手术前必须进行少量的外科手术(类似于牙科工作)以植入标记物。因此,标记物的类型和使用已成为图像引导手术的决定点。我们进行了一系列实验,试图更好地量化这两种类型标记的各个方面,以便做出更明智的决策。我们创建了一个由全尺寸塑料头骨[Wards Scientific Supply]组成的模型,并将500 ml生理盐水放在脑腔中。然后将头骨密封。将皮肤模拟材料DragonSkin〜[SmoothOn Company]涂在表面上并使其干燥。将皮肤固定基准点[Medtronic-SNT]和骨植入标记物[Z-Kat]放在模型上。此外,还放置了三个其他的骨植入标记(两个位于颅骨底部,一个位于眼窝中,用作目标)。标记以CT和4个MRI序列(T1加权,T2加权,SPGR和功能序列)成像。标记也使用Optotrak 3020 [Northern Digital Inc]定位在物理空间中。进行图像空间和物理空间之间的配准,并确定基准和目标配准错误。最终,去除了渗透到皮肤中的5种植入骨的制造器,并在“皮肤”表面上施加了相当于平均人头重量的25%的牵引力。再次进行目标和基准注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号