【24h】

Comparative site tests for various types of cone penetrometers in peat ground

机译:泥炭地中各种类型的锥度计的现场比较试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

With the objective of examining the accuracy of electric cone penetration tests (CPT) performed in peat layers, we conducted tests to compare electric cone penetrometers with Dutch double tube cone penetrometers, which have been used conventionally. Test results showed that electric cone penetrometers demonstrated test accuracy equal to that of Dutch double tube cone penetrometers, and the following correlations were found: qmechanical = 0.85 qt for clay and organic clay layers and qmechanical = qt for peat layers ("qmechanical" refers to penetration resistance measured using Dutch double tube cone penetrometers [Dutch cone penetration resistance] and "qt" refers to penetration resistance measured using electric cone penetrometers [CPT resistance]).
机译:为了检查在泥炭层中进行的电锥穿透测试(CPT)的准确性,我们进行了测试,以比较电锥穿透仪和荷兰传统的双管锥穿透仪。测试结果表明,电锥穿透仪的测试精度与荷兰双管锥穿透仪相同,并且发现以下相关性:粘土和有机粘土层的qmechanical = 0.85 qt以及泥煤层的qmechanical = qt(“ qmechanical”是指使用荷兰式双管锥形渗透仪测量的抗穿透性[荷兰锥穿透性]和“ qt”是指使用电动锥形渗透仪测量的抗穿透性[CPT电阻]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号