【24h】

Innovative Practices in Environmental Management

机译:环境管理创新实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This study explores what the literature indicates is occurring in environmentally conscious manufacturing (ECM), versus what companies in the electronics manufacturing sector actually report on their websites. It highlights the differences between the literature and practice, pointing to a proactive trend in ECM among large companies. Adequate measures for reporting the real costs and benefits of ECM appear to be lacking. Using a resource-based view of the firm, an organization with limited resources will only devote those resources to activities where the perceived benefits exceed the cost. In a metrics-priented world, lack of measurement and reporting can undermine the future growth of ECM. In addition, many of the costs and benefits of ECM may not be explicitly recognized, but rather assumed. This may relegate ECM approaches to be categorized as "necessary for compliance" or "cost centers", when in fact there may be significant benefits. This could limit ECM to meet regulatory compliance, and little more. To highlight the potential contribution of ECM to the corporation's success this study compares and contrasts current literature with existing operational practices discovered by gathering secondary data frorn the websites of environmentally proactive organizations.
机译:这项研究探索了文献表明环境意识制造(ECM)中正在发生的事情,而不是电子制造领域中的公司实际在其网站上报告的事情。它强调了文献与实践之间的差异,指出了大公司中ECM的积极趋势。似乎缺乏足够的措施来报告ECM的实际成本和收益。使用公司的基于资源的视图,资源有限的组织将仅将那些资源专用于预期收益超过成本的活动。在以指标为基础的世界中,缺乏度量和报告功能可能会损害ECM的未来增长。此外,ECM的许多成本和收益可能未明确确认,而是假设了。实际上,这可能使ECM方法被归类为“合规必要”或“成本中心”,而实际上可能会有很多好处。这可能会限制ECM满足法规要求,仅此而已。为了突出ECM对公司成功的潜在贡献,本研究将当前文献与通过收集环境积极组织网站上的辅助数据而发现的现有运营实践进行了比较和对比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号