首页> 外文会议>Communications and multimedia security >Mapping between Classical Risk Management and Game Theoretical Approaches
【24h】

Mapping between Classical Risk Management and Game Theoretical Approaches

机译:经典风险管理与博弈论方法之间的映射

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In a typical classical risk assessment approach, the probabilities are usually guessed and not much guidance is provided on how to get the probabilities right. When coming up with probabilities, people are generally not well calibrated. History may not always be a very good teacher. Hence, in this paper, we explain how game theory can be integrated into classical risk management. Game theory puts emphasis on collecting representative data on how stakeholders assess the values of the outcomes of incidents rather than collecting the likelihood or probability of incident scenarios for future events that may not be stochastic. We describe how it can be mapped and utilized for risk management by relating a game theoretically inspired risk management process to ISO/IEC 27005. This shows how all the steps of classical risk management can be mapped to steps in the game theoretical model, however, some of the game theoretical steps at best have a very limited existence in ISO/IEC 27005.
机译:在典型的经典风险评估方法中,通常会猜测概率,并且没有提供太多有关如何正确处理概率的指导。当提出概率时,人们通常没有得到很好的校准。历史不一定总是很好的老师。因此,在本文中,我们解释了博弈论如何被整合到经典风险管理中。博弈论着重于收集有关利益相关方如何评估事件结果值的代表性数据,而不是针对可能不是随机的未来事件收集事件发生的可能性或概率。我们通过将博弈论启发的风险管理过程与ISO / IEC 27005相关联,描述了如何将其映射并用于风险管理。这说明了如何将经典风险管理的所有步骤映射到博弈模型中的步骤。在ISO / IEC 27005中,某些游戏理论步骤充其量只能说是非常有限的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号