首页> 外文会议>Coherence Domain Optical Methods and Optical Coherence Tomography in Biomedicine X; Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging; vol.7 no.2 >Noise sources and optoelectronics which affect axial detection performance of time domain, Fourier domain and swept source optical coherence tomography
【24h】

Noise sources and optoelectronics which affect axial detection performance of time domain, Fourier domain and swept source optical coherence tomography

机译:影响时域,傅立叶域和扫频光源光学相干断层扫描的轴向检测性能的噪声源和光电器件

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Techniques based on spectral interferometry (SD-OCT) have recently been examined, with authors often suggesting superior performance compared to time domain optical coherence tomography (TD-OCT) techniques. While these technologies have similar resolutions and the spectral techniques may currently claim faster acquisition rates, their detection parameters may be inferior. This work examines the theoretical signal to noise ratio and dynamic range of these techniques including time domain. Considering the practical limits of optoelectronics, the often ignored or misunderstood factors which affect performance, such as vacuum fluctuations, the actual source of thermal noise, excess noise and A/D conversion losses, were taken into account. Methods for potentially improving signal to noise ratio (SNR), such as fast laser sweeping with high laser intensities and CCD integration, were evaluated as well. This is critical because dynamic range translates directly into imaging depth. The technologies are compared relative to the differences in these parameters. While Fourier domain OCT (FD-OCT) has some advantages such as signal integration, it appears unlikely that its disadvantages can ultimately be overcome. Ultimately, time TD-OCT appears to have the superior performance with respect to SNR and dynamic range. However certain positive aspects of swept source OCT (SS-OCT) leave open the possibility that its performance may approach that of TD-OCT.
机译:最近已经研究了基于光谱干涉术(SD-OCT)的技术,作者经常提出与时域光学相干断层扫描(TD-OCT)技术相比性能更高。尽管这些技术具有相似的分辨率,并且光谱技术当前可能要求更快的采集速率,但它们的检测参数可能较差。这项工作研究了这些技术的理论信噪比和动态范围,包括时域。考虑到光电子技术的实际限制,考虑了影响性能的通常被忽略或误解的因素,例如真空波动,实际热噪声源,过量噪声和A / D转换损耗。还评估了潜在改善信噪比(SNR)的方法,例如具有高激光强度的快速激光扫描和CCD集成。这很关键,因为动态范围直接转换为成像深度。相对于这些参数的差异比较了这些技术。尽管傅立叶域OCT(FD-OCT)具有一些优势,例如信号集成,但似乎不可能最终克服其缺点。最终,时间TD-OCT似乎在SNR和动态范围方面具有出色的性能。但是,扫频OCT(SS-OCT)的某些积极方面仍使它的性能接近TD-OCT的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号