首页> 外文会议>CIBO fluid bed XVI conference >Mine Placement of Coal Combustion Products (CCP’s) - Data Collection and Risk Assessment MRAM - An International and Interagency Cooperative Project
【24h】

Mine Placement of Coal Combustion Products (CCP’s) - Data Collection and Risk Assessment MRAM - An International and Interagency Cooperative Project

机译:煤燃烧产品(CCP)的矿井位置-数据收集和风险评估MRAM-国际机构间合作项目

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In April 2000, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued its regulatoryrndetermination with respect to the disposal of coal combustion byproducts, often calledrncombustion products or residuals. The agency determined at that time that these residuals, whilernshowing evidence of potential for risk to both human health and the environment, did not warrantrntreatment as hazardous wastes but, rather, should be managed in accordance with the provisionsrnof Subtitle D of RCRA; in effect passing enforcement authority to the States.rnAs a part of that regulatory determination, EPA also stated that it did not, at that time,rnhave enough data on minefilling practices to be able to pass judgment on the merits andrnprotectiveness of that practice on a nationwide basis. The practice of minefilling is a commonrnone, and various States have their own enforcement procedures on the books. Still, the varyingrngeochemistries and hydrologies, and the varying wastes, together with past mining practices thatrnhave in many cases seriously damaged the local environment, make the practice controversial.rnWith the help of many agencies, private firms, special interest groups and individuals,rnboth in the US and Canada, EPA began in 2001 a very wide ranging data collection effort aimedrnat determining what is happening at mine placement sites. To date these have all been coalrnmining sites, but there is no reason why, in principle, these same coal combustion products mightrnnot be used at other, non-coal mining, sites scarred and damaged by mining. All would dependrnon the chemistries and of course on the economics of haul-back. The following have beenrnleading players: EPA, DOE, DOI’s Office of Surface Mining, the Universities of West Virginiarnand North Dakota, representatives of Canadian utilities, several US states and theirrnrepresentatives, US industry represented by USWAG and CIBO, and a number of veryrnexperienced consulting firms as noted below.rnWe are starting to analyze data of varying quality from some 65 sites, with knowledge ofrnperhaps another 30-40 sites. We think, speaking only of coal mine sites, that upwards of anotherrn500 or more sites might be candidates for this practice if protective practices may be clearlyrnidentified and the non-protective practices, where such may exist, also identified. All partiesrn“own” these data; it is public information.
机译:2000年4月,美国环境保护署(EPA)发布了有关煤燃烧副产物(通常称为燃烧产物或残渣)处置的规定。该机构当时确定,这些残留物虽然显示出对人类健康和环境均具有潜在危险的证据,但不保证将其作为危险废物进行处理,而应按照RCRA标题D的规定进行管理;作为该监管决定的一部分,EPA还表示,当时当时没有足够的填埋方法数据,因此无法通过对该方法的优缺点进行判断。全国范围内。填埋是一种普遍的做法,许多国家在账簿上都有自己的执行程序。尽管如此,不断变化的地球化学和水文学以及不断变化的废物,加上过去在许多情况下严重破坏了当地环境的采矿实践,仍然使该实践引起争议。在许多机构,私人公司,特殊利益集团和个人的帮助下,在美国和加拿大,EPA于2001年开始了范围广泛的数据收集工作,旨在确定地雷安置现场的情况。迄今为止,这些都是煤矿场,但原则上没有理由为什么这些煤燃烧产物不能在其他因采矿而伤痕累累和受到破坏的非煤炭开采场使用。所有这些都取决于化学性质,当然也取决于回程的经济性。以下是最重要的参与者:EPA,DOE,DOI露天采矿办公室,西弗吉尼亚州大学和北达科他州的大学,加拿大公用事业公司的代表,美国多个州及其代表,以USWAG和CIBO为代表的美国工业,以及一些经验丰富的咨询公司如下所述。rn我们开始分析大约65个站点的质量不同的数据,而可能还要了解另外30-40个站点​​。我们认为,仅就煤矿场址而言,如果可以清楚地识别出保护性措施并识别出可能存在的非保护性措施,则另外500个或更多的场所可能是该措施的候选者。各方“拥有”这些数据;这是公共信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号