首页> 外文会议>Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences;ICAS 2010 >CRASHWORTHINESS ASSESSMENT IN AIRCRAFT DITCHING INCIDENTS
【24h】

CRASHWORTHINESS ASSESSMENT IN AIRCRAFT DITCHING INCIDENTS

机译:飞机排水事故中的人体工学评估

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In this paper, a comparative study has beenperformed between the Meshless Lagrangianand Coupled Lagrangian-Eulerian schemes, toevaluate their overall efficiency andeffectiveness for analyzing fluid-structureinteractive systems. Soft body impact eventsonto composite laminates representing primaryand secondary aircraft structures have beenstudied. Several cases with different birdvelocities have been simulated to observe thenon-linier behavior of soft body impact, alongwith the shortcomings of the modelingmethodologies applied. The MeshlessLagrangian model produced a higher initialpeak force, whereas the Coupled Lagrangian-Eulerian approach captured the impact windowmore smoothly with less obvious spikes. Theseschemes have also been compared with theconventional Lagrangian approach, whichproved to be less accurate due to high meshdistortion and loss of mass from erosion. Thestudy was further extended to analyze birdstrikeon a composite wing leading-edge. Withvalidation from experimental results, thedeveloped modeling methodology was also usedto analyze other fluid-structure interactivesystems such as structural damage caused byaircraft ditching over water.
机译:本文对无网格拉格朗日方案和拉格朗日-欧拉耦合方案进行了比较研究,以评估它们在分析流体结构相互作用系统方面的整体效率和有效性。已经研究了代表主要和次要飞机结构的复合材料层压板上的软体碰撞事件。模拟了几种具有不同鸟类速度的情况,以观察软体撞击的非线性行为,以及所采用的建模方法的缺点。 MeshlessLagrangian模型产生较高的初始峰值力,而Lagrangian-Eulerian耦合方法更平稳地捕获了冲击窗口,而没有明显的峰值。这些方法也已与传统的拉格朗日方法进行了比较,该方法由于较高的网格变形和侵蚀造成的质量损失而被证明不太准确。该研究进一步扩展,以分析复合材料机翼前缘的鸟震。经过实验结果的验证,所开发的建模方法还可以用于分析其他流体-结构相互作用系统,例如飞机在水上沟渠造成的结构破坏。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号