首页> 外文会议>ASME(American Society of Mechanical Engineers) Turbo Expo vol.2; 20060506-11; Barcelona(ES) >Simulation of Producer Gas Fired Power Plants with Inlet Fog Cooling and Steam Injection
【24h】

Simulation of Producer Gas Fired Power Plants with Inlet Fog Cooling and Steam Injection

机译:进气雾冷却和蒸汽注入模拟燃气电厂

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Biomass can be converted to energy via direct combustion or thermo-chemical conversion to liquid or gas fuels. This study focuses on burning producer gases derived from gasifying biomass wastes to produce power. Since the producer gases are usually low calorific values (LCV), the power plants performance under various operating conditions has not yet been proven. In this study, system performance calculations are conducted for 5MWe power plants. The power plants considered include simple gas turbine systems, steam turbine systems, combined cycle systems, and steam injection gas turbine systems (STIG) using the producer gas with low calorific values at approximately 30% and 15% of the natural gas heating value (on a mass basis). The LCV fuels are shown to impose high back compressor pressure and produces increased power output due to increased fuel flow. Turbine nozzle throat area is adjusted to accommodate additional fuel flows to allow compressor operate within safety margin. The best performance occurs when the designed pressure ratio is maintained by widening nozzle openings, even though the TIT is reduced under this adjustment. Power augmentations under four different ambient conditions are calculated by employing gas turbine inlet fog cooling. Comparison between inlet fog cooling and steam injection using the same amount of water mass flow indicates that steam injection is less effective than inlet fog cooling in augmenting power output. Maximizing steam injection, at the expense of supplying the steam to the steam turbine, significantly reduces both the efficiency and the output power of the combined cycle. This study indicates that the performance of gas turbine and combined cycle systems fueled by the LCV fuels could be very different from the familiar behavior of natural gas fired systems. Care must be taken if on-shelf gas turbines are modified to burn LCV fuels.
机译:生物质可通过直接燃烧或热化学转化为液体或气体燃料而转化为能量。这项研究的重点是燃烧从气化生物质废物中产生的生产气,以发电。由于生产气体通常为低热值(LCV),因此尚未证明电厂在各种运行条件下的性能。在这项研究中,对5MWe发电厂进行了系统性能计算。所考虑的发电厂包括简单的燃气轮机系统,蒸汽轮机系统,联合循环系统和注汽燃气轮机系统(STIG),这些燃气使用的发热量低,大约为天然气热值的30%和15%。质量)。显示LCV燃料会施加较高的反向压缩机压力,并且由于燃料流量增加而产生增加的功率输出。调节涡轮喷嘴的喉部面积以容纳额外的燃料流,以使压缩机在安全范围内运行。通过加宽喷嘴口来保持设计压力比时,即使在此调节下降低了TIT,也能达到最佳性能。通过采用燃气轮机进气雾冷却来计算四种不同环境条件下的功率增加。在使用相同量的水质量流量的进口雾冷却和蒸汽喷射之间的比较表明,在增加功率输出方面,蒸气喷射的效率不如进口雾冷却。最大程度地增加蒸汽喷射,却以向蒸汽轮机供应蒸汽为代价,大大降低了联合循环的效率和输出功率。这项研究表明,以LCV燃料为燃料的燃气轮机和联合循环系统的性能可能与天然气燃烧系统的常见行为大不相同。如果对现成的燃气轮机进行改装以燃烧LCV燃料,则必须小心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号