【24h】

AN ANALYSIS OF PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS CONFIGURATIONS WHERE AN A POSTERIORI FE CRITERION IMPROVES SIMULATION MODELS CONSISTENCY

机译:后验准则改善仿真模型一致性的产品开发过程配置分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A mechanical behavioural analysis can be useful at different stages of the product development process, and there are different scenarios where a FE (Finite Element) analysis can support the design phase. Unfortunately, preparing a model suitable for the FE analysis and solving a FE problem are time expensive and need a considerable involvement of simulation experts. In this paper, we analyze several scenarios of product development process, where an a posteriori criterion allows exploiting some existing FE analysis results. Their common denominator stands in the evaluation of the impact of the component shape modifications on the accuracy of existing FE results, by means of an a posteriori FE error indicator. It is computed using the stress and strain fields over the component. This indicator is targeted to determine whether a shape sub-domain has some influence over pre-existing FE analysis results, I.e. whether an accurate FE analysis needs to use a model including this sub-domain. Here, we will describe the input and output parameters of our a posteriori indicator and what are the requirements for its incorporation in the different scenarios. Each of the proposed scenarios will be analyzed and illustrated to identify its potentials and requirements.
机译:机械行为分析可能在产品开发过程的不同阶段有用,并且在不同的情况下,有限元分析也可以支持设计阶段。不幸的是,准备适合于有限元分析的模型并解决有限元问题是费时的,并且需要仿真专家的大量参与。在本文中,我们分析了产品开发过程的几种方案,其中后验准则允许利用一些现有的有限元分析结果。它们的共同点是通过后验有限元误差指示器评估零件形状修改对现有有限元分析结果的准确性的影响。它是使用组件上的应力和应变场计算的。该指标旨在确定形状子域是否对预先存在的有限元分析结果(即准确的FE分析是否需要使用包含此子域的模型。在这里,我们将描述后验指标的输入和输出参数,以及将其并入不同场景的要求。将对每个建议的方案进行分析和说明,以确定其潜力和要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号