首页> 外文会议>ASCE National Conference on Environmental and Pipeline Engineering Jul 23-26, 2000, Kansas City, Missouri >Comparison of Trenchless vs. Open-Cut Construction Methods for the Replacement of a Leaking Water Distribution System
【24h】

Comparison of Trenchless vs. Open-Cut Construction Methods for the Replacement of a Leaking Water Distribution System

机译:比较无沟与明挖施工方法更换漏水分配系统

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A water distribution system located in a growing residential community north of Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas, was experiencing a higher rate of water leakage and pipe breaks than was considered acceptable. The main breaks appeared to be a result of continued external corrosion. Experience has shown that the frequency of main breaks would likely increase, but the municipal officials were very concerned about the potential disruption that would occur with any replacement or rehabilitation project. A feasibility study demonstrated that a trenchless alternative could be successfully implemented at a lower cost than with conventional open-cut methods. Directional drilling was selected to replace approximately 3,962 m (13,000 ft) of water mains in multiple phases; the first phase included the construction of approximately 1,585 m (5,200 ft) during 2000. This paper describes the results of the technical and economic feasibility study, the detailed design performed, and the construction program implemented.
机译:位于得克萨斯州达拉斯/沃思堡以北的一个不断发展的住宅社区中的配水系统,出现的漏水和管道破裂的发生率比人们认为的更高。主要断裂似乎是持续外部腐蚀的结果。经验表明,主要中断的频率可能会增加,但是市政官员非常担心任何更换或修复项目可能会造成的中断。一项可行性研究表明,与传统的开挖方法相比,无沟槽替代方案可以以更低的成本成功实施。选择定向钻井以分阶段替换大约3,962 m(13,000 ft)的水管;第一阶段包括2000年约1,585 m(5,200 ft)的建设。本文介绍了技术和经济可行性研究的结果,进行的详细设计以及已实施的建设计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号