首页> 外文会议>Annual research conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists 2010 >Is Tilt Interaction Better Than Keypad Interaction for Mobile Map-based Applications?
【24h】

Is Tilt Interaction Better Than Keypad Interaction for Mobile Map-based Applications?

机译:对于基于移动地图的应用程序,倾斜交互是否比键盘交互更好?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Map-based applications are becoming standard features of most smart phones. Keypad and touch-screen interaction have traditionally been used to interact with maps on mobile phones, but both these interaction techniques have several shortcomings. Tilt interaction offers an alternative approach with several advantages. Tilt interaction is intuitive and can be performed one-handed. Previous research has shown that tilt interaction offers equivalent or inferior results in terms of effectiveness, efficiency and preference. Similar studies have offered limited insight into the comparative performance of tilt and keypad interaction. This paper discusses the development and comparative evaluation of a prototype mobile map-based application supporting both keypad and tilt interaction. The results of this evaluation showed that keypad interaction was more efficient for tasks requiring precise selection, but that tilt interaction offered greater perceived controllability, efficiency and ease of use for navigation tasks.
机译:基于地图的应用程序已成为大多数智能手机的标准功能。传统上,键盘和触摸屏交互已用于与手机上的地图进行交互,但是这两种交互技术都有一些缺点。倾斜交互提供了一种具有多种优势的替代方法。倾斜交互很直观,可以单手执行。先前的研究表明,倾斜互动在有效性,效率和偏好方面提供的结果相当或逊色。类似的研究对倾斜和键盘交互的比较性能提供了有限的见识。本文讨论了同时支持键盘和倾斜交互的基于移动地图的原型应用程序的开发和比较评估。评估的结果表明,键盘交互对于需要精确选择的任务更为有效,但是倾斜交互为导航任务提供了更好的感知可控制性,效率和易用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号