【24h】

Practical geotechnical application of reliability methods

机译:可靠方法在岩土工程中的实际应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

What is an acceptable safety factor? Why is it usually associated with strength and not geometry or pore pressure? Reliability analysis places decision making in a rational framework, and it is now beginning to affect geotechnical practice. Three case studies are discussed. The first involved three embankment designs showing that expected values of the factors of safety were in inverse order to their reliability. The analysis yielded target values of factor of safety and revealed parametric sensitivities. The second involved a slope in Karst for which no conventional stability analysis was appropriate. Statistical analysis of observed failures led to a decision among proposed remediation schemes. The third case involved the liquefaction potential for an oil storage tank farm located on filled land. The analysis ranged from seismic hazard analysis to the use of F-N plots to display results. Management decided to proceed with a multi-million dollar program of groundwater control.
机译:可接受的安全系数是多少?为什么通常与强度相关,而不与几何或孔隙压力相关?可靠性分析将决策放在一个合理的框架中,并且现在开始影响岩土工程实践。讨论了三个案例研究。首先涉及三个路堤设计,表明安全系数的期望值与其可靠性成反比。分析得出安全系数的目标值,并显示出参数敏感性。第二个涉及喀斯特的斜坡,因此不适合进行常规稳定性分析。对观察到的故障进行统计分析,从而在提议的修复方案中做出决定。第三种情况涉及位于填埋土地上的储油罐场的液化潜力。分析范围从地震危险性分析到使用F-N图显示结果。管理层决定继续进行一项耗资数百万美元的地下水控制计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号