【24h】

Thermodynamically consistent versus completely empirical property models in process simulation

机译:过程模拟中的热力学一致性模型与完全经验模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Physical and chemical property models are widely used in process engineering. There exist, in the published literature, completely empirical models of "thermodynamic properties", that is, property models that are not consistent with the laws of thermodynamics. There also exist property models that purport to be thermodynamically consistent but are flawed in their implementation. There are also published property models that are consistent with the laws of thermodynamics but that do not reproduce property values with an acceptable accuracy. A practicing engineer might be asked to assess very different property models for which there are a variety of claims. This paper discusses features of thermodynamic and empirical property models that may assist in their practical evaluation and implementation.
机译:物理和化学特性模型广泛用于过程工程中。在公开的文献中,存在“热力学性质”的完全经验模型,即与热力学定律不一致的性质模型。还存在一些属性模型,这些属性模型声称在热力学上是一致的,但是在实现上存在缺陷。还发布了符合热力学定律的属性模型,但不能以可接受的精度复制属性值。可能会要求执业工程师评估各种索赔的非常不同的财产模型。本文讨论了热力学和经验性质模型的特征,这些特征可能有助于它们的实际评估和实施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号