首页> 外文会议>Aerospace International Symposium "CARAFOLI 2001", Oct 19-20, 2001, Bucharest ROMANIA >AUTOMATIC CONTROL SYSTEM FOR AN UNMANNED AIR VEHICLE - A MARKOVIAN MODEL APPROACH
【24h】

AUTOMATIC CONTROL SYSTEM FOR AN UNMANNED AIR VEHICLE - A MARKOVIAN MODEL APPROACH

机译:无人飞行器的自动控制系统-马尔可夫模型方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The synthesis problem of wing deployment of an Unmanned Air Vehicle was considered via the Jump Markovian Systems approach. The change in the vehicle's dynamics duo to wing deployment was given a probabilistic interpretation, where the probability of deploying the wings from a folded position increases exponentially with time. However, once deployed, the wings remain open and , therefore, have a zero probability of switching back to a folded position. This description may even be closer to reality than the more intuitive deterministic one whereby the instant of wing deployment is selected according to a set of a-priori defined conditions on the angle attack and its derivative (e.g. small absolute value of the angle of attack combined with a small absolute derivative of the angle of attack). Even in the deterministic case, the first moment during which the above conditions are satisfied may depend on random parameters such as the angle of attack of the host vehicle at release, its velocity, etc. giving rise, in a very natural way, to a probabilistic interpretation of the switching time. For the situation where wing deployment timing is defined a-priori, the transition probabilities may be considered to be design parameters tuned to maximizing closed loop bandwidth, minimizing control effort, etc. The results achieved by the Markovian Jump Systems approach are quite encouraging. For very short duration wing deployment, the Markov Jump theory based disturbance attenuation factor is markedly less than those obtained with the more common approaches of simply treating each wing state separately or requiring quadratic stability. The latter uses a single gain matrix to control the plant during its two different phases and, therefore, does not utilize the information about the parameter .jumps, thus resulting in poor performance with a large control effort. Separately treating the closed and open wing systems does utilize the jump information, but does not account for the transient, thus leading to good disturbance attenuation but at the cost of large controls. The Markovian Jump approach uses different gain vectors for each phase while accounting for the jump. Although the probabilistic modeling of the jump may seem somewhat artificial in the case of a single shot wing deployment operation, where no folding back of the wings is possible, the approach suggested in the present paper can be thought of as a "gain scheduling" approach for systems with discrete operating points. This approach loses it's advantage when the transition between these operating points is slow. The suggested procedure of comparing performance levels using both deterministic and stochastic frame-works may be a useful addition to the overall control design process. Although the application presented for the Markov Jump approach - wing deployment in an Unmanned Air Vehicles - is not very common in the aerospace industry, the design, analysis and simulation procedure suggested here may be relevant for other applications where possibly fast enough transitions occur between discrete operating points.
机译:通过跳跃马尔可夫系统方法考虑了无人飞行器机翼展开的综合问题。车辆动力学特性从机翼展开到机翼展开的变化得到了概率解释,其中从折叠位置展开机翼的概率随时间呈指数增长。但是,一旦展开,机翼将保持打开状态,因此切换回折叠位置的可能性为零。该描述甚至可能比更直观的确定性描述更接近现实,在确定性描述中,机翼展开的时刻是根据角度攻及其推导的先验定义条件集(例如,较小的攻角绝对值组合)来选择的。具有较小的攻角绝对导数)。即使在确定性情况下,满足上述条件的第一时刻也可能取决于随机参数,例如宿主车辆在释放时的迎角,其速度等,以非常自然的方式引起切换时间的概率解释。对于机翼部署时间先验定义的情况,可以将过渡概率视为已调整为最大化闭环带宽,最小化控制工作量等的设计参数。马尔可夫跳跃系统方法所取得的结果令人鼓舞。对于非常短的机翼部署,基于马尔可夫跳跃理论的扰动衰减因子明显小于采用简单方法分别处理每个机翼状态或需要二次稳定性的更常见方法所获得的扰动衰减因子。后者使用单个增益矩阵来控制植物的两个不同阶段,因此,它不利用有关参数跳转的信息,从而导致在较大的控制努力下性能较差。单独处理封闭和开放机翼系统确实利用了跳跃信息,但没有考虑瞬变,因此导致了良好的干扰衰减,但要付出大量控制的代价。马尔可夫跳跃法在考虑跳跃的同时对每个相位使用不同的增益矢量。尽管在单发机翼展开操作中跳跃的概率建模似乎有些人为,但机翼无法向后折叠,但本文中建议的方法可以认为是“增益调度”方法用于具有离散工作点的系统。当这些工作点之间的转换缓慢时,这种方法将失去其优势。使用确定性框架和随机框架比较性能水平的建议过程可能是整个控制设计过程的有用补充。尽管针对Markov Jump方法提出的应用程序(无人飞行器中的机翼部署)在航空航天行业中并不常见,但此处建议的设计,分析和仿真过程可能与其他应用程序相关,这些应用程序可能在离散点之间发生足够快的过渡工作点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号