【24h】

CFAR Different Schemes Behavior and Detection Performance of Moving Targets

机译:CFAR不同方案的运动目标行为和检测性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this paper detection probability of different CFAR schemes CA, GO, SO, and OS-CFAR is computed via various values of false alarm probability. The CA-CFAR and GO-CFAR detection performance is superior over other schemes; OS-CFAR detection performance appears to be the quasi of CA-CFAR but needs more processing time than CA-CFAR. Moving target detection is investigated Each of the CA, GO, OS-CFAR schemes gives acceptable detection probability at higher values of SNR and gives, as well, maximum performance in the range of 10~(-4) to 10~(-6) probability of false alarm. The SO-CFAR scheme doesn't offer any advantage over other CFAR processors.
机译:在本文中,通过错误警报概率的各种值来计算不同CFAR方案CA,GO,SO和OS-CFAR的检测概率。 CA-CFAR和GO-CFAR的检测性能优于其他方案; OS-CFAR的检测性能似乎是CA-CFAR的准者,但比CA-CFAR需要更多的处理时间。研究了移动目标检测,每种CA,GO,OS-CFAR方案均可以在较高SNR值下提供可接受的检测概率,并在10〜(-4)至10〜(-6)范围内提供最佳性能。错误警报的可能性。与其他CFAR处理器相比,SO-CFAR方案没有任何优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号