首页> 外文会议>7th World Conference on Timber Engineering, WCTE 2002 Vol.4, Aug 12-15, 2002, Shah Alam, Malaysia >PERFORMANCE OF STRUCTURAL WOOD PRODUCTS: PRODUCER RESPONSIBILITIES AND CUSTOMER EXPECTATIONS
【24h】

PERFORMANCE OF STRUCTURAL WOOD PRODUCTS: PRODUCER RESPONSIBILITIES AND CUSTOMER EXPECTATIONS

机译:结构木制品的性能:生产者的责任和客户期望

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Standards for structural wood products throughout the world contain a variety of implicit and explicit levels of performance targets. For example, in North America, one frequently quoted historical strength-based performance target for flexural members is that the near-minimum flexural strength (often selected to be the 5th percentile of the assumed population) meets or exceeds 2.1 times the published allowable bending design value. Over the decades since these targets have become embedded in standards throughout the world, structural wood products and their applications have significantly evolved. For example, engineered wood products such as structural composite lumber (SCL), glued-laminated beams (glulam), and various types of wood trusses and I-joists continue to expand the range of applications achievable by structural wood products. This paper recalls the historical basis of the traditional performance targets in a variety of codes and standards throughout the world. The discussion proceeds with the potential pitfalls of oversimplifying performance targets and explores the various levels of performance verification that are required for one product versus another. Perspectives are provided from various user groups regarding their performance expectations for structural wood products. Potential discrepancies between customer expectations and verifiable performance levels are identified, and the responsibility for verifiable product quality is placed squarely on the shoulders of the manufacturer. The paper concludes by asking the audience whether our international structural wood standards provide adequate verification of performance levels across a range of products, given the potential pitfalls that have been discussed. It also asks whether manufacturers can provide verification of the performance levels for their products, and whether they fully understand that they - not the codes or standards or 3rd party agencies - are responsible for their product quality and safety in applications.
机译:世界各地的结构木产品标准都包含各种隐性和显性水平的性能目标。例如,在北美,经常引用的基于历史强度的抗弯构件性能指标是,近乎最小的抗弯强度(通常选择为假定人口的第5个百分位数)达到或超过已发布的允许弯曲设计的2.1倍值。自从这些目标已成为全球标准所嵌入的几十年以来,结构木产品及其应用已发生了巨大的发展。例如,工程木制品,例如结构复合木材(SCL),胶合层压梁(胶合木)以及各种类型的木桁架和工字托梁,继续扩大了结构木制品可达到的应用范围。本文回顾了全世界各种法规和标准中传统绩效目标的历史基础。讨论着重于过于简化性能目标的潜在陷阱,并探讨了一种产品与另一种产品所需的各种级别的性能验证。各种用户群体对他们对结构木产品的性能期望提供了观点。确定客户期望与可验证的性能水平之间的潜在差异,并将可验证的产品质量责任直接置于制造商的肩膀上。本文的结尾是询问观众,鉴于已经讨论过的潜在陷阱,我们的国际结构木标准是否能对各种产品的性能水平提供充分的验证。它还询问制造商是否可以提供其产品性能水平的验证,以及他们是否完全了解自己(而不是法规或标准或第三方机构)对产品的质量和应用安全负责。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号