【24h】

CO_2 STORAGE AND SINK ENHANCEMENTS: DEVELOPING COMPARABLE ECONOMICS

机译:CO_2的存储和增强功能:发展可比的经济学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper reports on a project that compared the economics of major technologies and practices under development for CO_2 storage and sink enhancement, including options for storing captured CO_2, such as active oil reservoirs, depleted oil and gas reservoirs, deep aquifers, coal beds, and oceans, as well as the enhancement of biological sinks such as forests and croplands. For the geologic and ocean storage options, CO_2 capture costs from another project were added to the costs of CO_2 storage estimated in this project to provide combined costs of CO_2 capture and storage. Combined costs of CO_2 capture and storage were compared with CO_2 sink enhancement costs on a life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) avoided basis. The CO_2 storage and sink enhancement options compared in this project differ greatly in the timing and permanence of CO_2 sequestration. In addressing the timing and permanence issue, a 100-year planning horizon was assumed and the net present value of both costs and revenues was considered. The methods for comparing the economics of diverse CO_2 storage and sink enhancement options are overviewed and representative base-case costs of storage and sink enhancement options are compared.
机译:本文报告了一个项目,该项目比较了正在开发的主要技术和实践的经济性,以用于CO_2的存储和汇的提高,包括用于存储捕获的CO_2的选项,例如活性油层,枯竭的油气层,深层含水层,煤层和海洋,以及增强森林和农田等生物汇。对于地质和海洋存储选项,将另一个项目的CO_2捕获成本添加到该项目中估算的CO_2存储成本中,以提供CO_2捕获和存储的总成本。在避免生命周期的温室气体(GHG)的基础上,将CO_2捕集和封存的总成本与CO_2汇汇增加的成本进行了比较。在此项目中比较的CO_2储存和汇吸收增强选项在固存CO_2的时间和持久性上有很大差异。在解决时间和永久性问题时,假设了100年的规划期,并考虑了成本和收入的净现值。概述了比较各种CO_2储存和接收器增强选项经济性的方法,并比较了储存和接收器增强选项的代表性基础案例成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号