【24h】

Comparison of ECN-ELFN and SACK on TCP's Performance for Ad Hoc Networks

机译:Ad Hoc网络的ECN-ELFN和SACK对TCP性能的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this paper we study the energy cost (protocol processing and communication cost) and goodput of two different flavors of TCP in ad hoc networks. We implemented a testbed and measured the actual energy cost as well as goodput of running TCP-SACK in ad hoc network scenarios. We also implemented Explicit Link Failure Notification (ELFN) and Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) in Newreno and measured its performance. We see that the use of ECN & ELFN does yield higher goodput in most cases with a corresponding lower total energy cost. We see an energy savings of between 20% and 500% depending on the network conditions.
机译:在本文中,我们研究了ad hoc网络中两种不同口味的TCP的能源成本(协议处理和通信成本)和吞吐量。我们实施了一个测试平台,并测量了在特殊网络情况下的实际能源成本以及运行TCP-SACK的吞吐量。我们还在Newreno中实施了显式链路故障通知(ELFN)和显式拥塞通知(ECN)并评估了其性能。我们看到,在大多数情况下,使用ECN和ELFN确实可以获得更高的吞吐量,而总能源成本也相应降低。根据网络状况,我们可以节省20%到500%的能源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号