首页> 外文会议>3rd Asia-Pacific international conference on computational methods in engineering >The Boundary Face Method with Variable Approximation by B-spline Basis Functions
【24h】

The Boundary Face Method with Variable Approximation by B-spline Basis Functions

机译:B样条基函数的可变逼近边界面方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The objective of this work is to use the isogeometric analysis to solve the Boundary Integral Equation (BIE). The concept of isogeometric analysis[1] was firstly proposed by Hughes, and implemented in the Finite Element Method (FEM). The main idea of isogeometric analysis is that the same interpolation functions are used to construct an exact geometric model and to approximate physical variables. As a result, the exact geometry can be maintained at all levels within an adaptive analysis. There are two main aspects included in the concept, one is to build a surface representation of an exact geometry, by which the transformation from parametric coordinates to the Cartesian coordinates can be easily performed, hence the normal and tangent vectors on the surface can be obtained from CAD modeling. The other aspect is to use the same interpolation functions in the analysis that are set up by solid modeling, possibly the mesh can also be shared with the solid modeling.As an important numerical method, Boundary Element Method (BEM) has been widely studied in the last few decades. It is based on the study of the equation governing field problems in the form of BIE rather than the more usual differential ones. One of the most important features of the BEM is that only the boundaries of the region being investigated have to be discretized, which therefore leads to much fewer discrete elements than any other method, such as the FEM in which the whole region need to be divided into many elements. Thus, a large amount of CPU time and resource used for discretization can be saved. In the application of the isogeometrc analysis in the numerical solution of BIE, exact geometric model can be obtained through the Boundary representation (Brep) of any solid modeling packages.The Boundary Face Method (BFM)[2] has been implemented with boundary variables approximated by the Moving Least Squares (MLS). Similar to the isogeometric analysis, the geometric data at Gaussian quadrature points, such as the coordinates, the Jacobian and the outward normal are calculated directly from the exact geometry rather than elements interpolation, thus the geometric error is eliminated. However, the BFM analysis is not isogeometric in a precise sense, as the parameters used for description of the boundary faces and for approximation of the field variables are different.As a primary step, this paper presents a new implementation of BFM, in which the B-spline basis of three orders was used to approximate the boundary variables. The B-spline basis possesses useful mathematical properties, such as the ability to be refined through knot insertion, the variation diminishing, the convex hull and the compact support. As for the compact support, the basis functions are defined on the local knot vector, but the boundary variables are still defined on the global as control points. In order to ensure that the number of control points in all columns is equal to the number of bases, we use different meshes for the control net and parametric net. Numerical examples for 3D potential and elastostatic problems indicate that B-spline basis as an interpolation function has more advantages over the MLS approximation, not only in terms of accuracy but also in terms of CPU time and convergence rate. As a second step, the B-spline basis will be used to construct the geometric model to achieve a truely isogeometric analysis. The higher precision and tighter integration of the overall modeling-analysis process are expected. Finally, a new method of T-spline[3] was proposed by T.W. Sederberg is also planned to be implemented in the BFM. The control points and knot vectors in T-spline are defined on the local, which allows more freedom to choose the B-spline basis functions. Using T-spline for isogeometric analysis will be a direction of our future work.
机译:这项工作的目的是使用等几何分析来解决边界积分方程(BIE)。休斯(Hughes)最早提出了等几何分析的概念[1],并在有限元方法(FEM)中得以实现。等几何分析的主要思想是,使用相同的插值函数来构建精确的几何模型并近似物理变量。结果,可以在自适应分析中的所有级别上保持精确的几何形状。此概念包含两个主要方面,一个是构建精确几何图形的表面表示,通过该表面表示,可以轻松地执行从参数坐标到笛卡尔坐标的转换,因此可以获得表面上的法线和切向量从CAD建模。另一方面是在分析中使用与实体建模建立的插值函数相同的插值函数,可能还可以与实体建模共享网格。作为一种重要的数值方法,边界元方法(BEM)已被广泛研究。最近几十年。它基于对以BIE形式而不是更常见的微分形式的场问题方程的研究。 BEM的最重要特征之一是仅需离散所研究区域的边界,因此与任何其他方法(例如需要划分整个区域的FEM)相比,所导致的离散元素要少得多融入许多元素因此,可以节省大量的CPU时间和用于离散化的资源。等渗分析在BIE数值解中的应用,可以通过任何实体建模包的边界表示(Brep)获得精确的几何模型。边界面法(BFM)[2]已实现,边界变量近似由移动最小二乘(MLS)。与等几何分析相似,高斯正交点的几何数据(例如坐标,雅可比定律和向外法线)直接从精确的几何体而不是元素插值中计算出来,从而消除了几何误差。然而,BFM分析并不是精确的等距几何,因为用于描述边界面和逼近场变量的参数是不同的。作为第一步,本文介绍了BFM的新实现,其中使用三阶的B样条近似边界变量。 B样条曲线具有有用的数学属性,例如可以通过打结,变小,凸包和紧密支撑进行细化。对于紧凑支持,基函数在局部结矢量上定义,但边界变量仍在全局上定义为控制点。为了确保所有列中的控制点数等于基数,我们对控制网和参数网使用不同的网格。有关3D潜在和弹性静力学问题的数值示例表明,作为样条函数的B样条基不仅在准确性方面,而且在CPU时间和收敛速度方面,都比MLS近似具有更多优势。第二步,将使用B样条曲线构建几何模型,以实现真正的等几何分析。期望整个建模分析过程具有更高的精度和更紧密的集成。最后,T.W。提出了一种新的T样条方法[3]。 Sederberg也计划在BFM中实施。 T样条曲线中的控制点和结点矢量是在局部定义的,这样可以更自由地选择B样条曲线基函数。使用T样条进行等几何分析将是我们未来工作的方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号