首页> 外文会议>34th Wind energy symposium 2016 >Direct and Surrogate-Based Optimization of Dual-Rotor Wind Turbines
【24h】

Direct and Surrogate-Based Optimization of Dual-Rotor Wind Turbines

机译:基于直接和替代的双转子风力发电机优化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Dual-rotor wind turbines (DRWT) may offer better energy efficiency over their single-rotor counterparts. The design and analysis of DRWT requires, among other, the use of computational fluid dynamics models. These models can be, depending on their formulation, computationally heavy. Numerous simulations are then required during the design process, and this may render the overall computational cost to be prohibitive. This paper investigates and compares several optimization techniques for the design of DRWTs. In particular, we solve the DRWT fluid flow using the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes equations with a two-equation turbulence model on an axisymmetric mesh, and consider three design approaches: the traditional parametric sweep where the design variables are varied and the responses examined, direct optimization with a derivative-free algorithm, and surrogate-based optimization (SBO) using data-driven surrogates. The approaches are applied to test cases involving two and three design variables. The results show that the same optimized designs are obtained with all the approaches. However, going from the two parameter case to the three parameter one, the effort of setting up, running, and analyzing the results increases significantly with the parametric sweep approach. The optimization techniques are much easier to use and deliver the results with lower computational cost, where the SBO algorithm outperforms the direct approach.
机译:双转子风力涡轮机(DRWT)可能比其单转子风力涡轮机具有更高的能源效率。 DRWT的设计和分析尤其需要使用计算流体动力学模型。这些模型根据其公式可能在计算上很繁琐。然后在设计过程中需要进行大量仿真,这可能会使总体计算成本过高。本文研究并比较了几种设计DRWT的优化技术。特别是,我们在轴对称网格上使用带有两方程湍流模型的雷诺平均Navier-Stokes方程来求解DRWT流体流,并考虑了三种设计方法:传统的参数化扫描,其中设计变量是变化的,并且要检查响应,使用无导数算法的直接优化以及使用数据驱动的替代方案的基于替代的优化(SBO)。该方法适用于涉及两个和三个设计变量的测试用例。结果表明,所有方法均获得了相同的优化设计。但是,从两个参数的情况到三个参数的情况,设置,运行和分析结果的工作量随参数扫描方法而显着增加。优化技术更易于使用,并且以较低的计算成本提供结果,而SBO算法的性能优于直接方法。

著录项

  • 来源
    《34th Wind energy symposium 2016》|2016年|422-437|共16页
  • 会议地点 San Diego CA(US)
  • 作者单位

    Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50011, USA;

    Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50011, USA;

    Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, 50011, USA;

    Engineering Optimization Modeling Center, Reykjavik University, Menntavegur 1, 101 Reykjavik, Iceland;

  • 会议组织
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号