首页> 外文会议>24th NATO/CCMS International Technical Meeting (ITM) on Air Pollution Modelling and Its Application, May 15-19, 2000, Boulder, Colorado >LAGRANGIAN PARTICLE SIMULATION OF AN EPA WIND TUNNEL TRACER EXPERIMENT IN A SCHEMATIC TWO-DIMENSIONAL VALLEY
【24h】

LAGRANGIAN PARTICLE SIMULATION OF AN EPA WIND TUNNEL TRACER EXPERIMENT IN A SCHEMATIC TWO-DIMENSIONAL VALLEY

机译:二维二维谷地EPA风洞追踪实验的拉格朗日粒子模拟

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Recently, our group developed a complete 3-D model system aimed to simulate atmospheric pollutant dispersion in complex terrain. The system includes the RAMS model (Pielke et al. 1992) providing, the flow field, the Lagrangian Stochastic Models SPRAY (Tinarelli et al., in press; Ferrero and Anfossi 1998) computing the dispersion, and the interface code MIRS (Trini Castelli and Anfossi, 1997). Turbulent quantities can be calculated in MIRS by parameterisations from literature or by the turbulent kinetic energy (E) field, directly extracted by RAMS meteorological output. This model system is applied to the wind tunnel EPA-RUSVAL tracer experiment (Khurshudyan et al. 1990) in which a neutral flow is reproduced on a 2-D cross-wind valley and the source is placed near the bottom of the valley. In the version of RAMS here used, we have replaced the Mellor-Yamada 2.5 turbulence closure with both E-l and E-ε closures, where l is the length scale and ε the mean rate of E dissipation. In a previous work (Trini Castelli et al. 1999) we showed that these last reproduce the flow and the turbulent fields in this wind tunnel experiment better than the Mellor-Yamada 2.5 model, originally implemented in RAMS. The influence of these different turbulent closures on the dispersion process is tested by comparing the SPRAY simulations with the observed tracer concentration fields. We focus our attention on the comparison between the simulations carried out using the Hanna (1982) parameterisation and the turbulent field supplied by the E-l or E-ε model.
机译:最近,我们小组开发了一个完整的3-D模型系统,旨在模拟复杂地形中的大气污染物扩散。该系统包括提供流场的RAMS模型(Pielke等,1992),计算弥散的拉格朗日随机模型SPRAY(Tinarelli等,印刷中; Ferrero和Anfossi 1998)以及接口代码MIRS(Trini Castelli)。和安福斯(1997)。湍流量可以在MIRS中通过文献中的参数化或通过湍流动能(E)字段(由RAMS气象输出直接提取)来计算。该模型系统应用于风洞EPA-RUSVAL示踪剂实验(Khurshudyan等,1990),在该实验中,在二维横风谷上产生了中性流,且源位于谷底附近。在这里使用的RAMS版本中,我们用E-1和E-ε闭合件替换了Mellor-Yamada 2.5湍流闭合件,其中l是长度刻度,ε是平均E耗散率。在以前的工作中(Trini Castelli等人,1999),我们证明了这些最后的方法比最初在RAMS中实现的Mellor-Yamada 2.5模型更好地再现了该风洞实验中的流动和湍流场。通过将SPRAY模拟与观察到的示踪剂浓度场进行比较,测试了这些不同湍流闭合对​​分散过程的影响。我们将注意力集中在使用Hanna(1982)参数化进行的仿真与E-1或E-ε模型提供的湍流之间的比较上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号