首页> 外文会议>20th International System Safety Conference, Aug 5-9, 2002, Denver, CO >Lessons Learned from a System Safety Analysis of an Automatic Train Protection System
【24h】

Lessons Learned from a System Safety Analysis of an Automatic Train Protection System

机译:从自动列车保护系统的系统安全分析中学到的经验教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Rail is used as a form of transportation by millions of people each day. Many of these rail transit systems utilize, to some extent, automatic operation. Automatic operation of rail transit vehicles is provided by an Automatic Train Control (ATC) system, which is typically partitioned into three subsystems: Automatic Train Protection (ATP), Automatic Train Operation (ATO), and Automatic Train Supervision (ATS). This paper will show how a system safety analysis can be used to identify weaknesses in ATP systems and how the safety of automatic operations can be improved. A Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) was performed on an ATP system to identify weaknesses in a train's safety system. The results of the FTA showed that the Carborne portion of the ATP system did not meet the "fail safe" design criteria. This paper uses the results of the FTA to identify possible safety improvements. The safety of the Carborne ATP subsystem was then reevaluated incorporating the identified improvements to show the attainable increase in safety.
机译:每天有数百万人使用铁路作为交通工具。这些铁路运输系统中的许多在某种程度上利用了自动操作。轨道交通车辆的自动运行由自动火车控制(ATC)系统提供,该系统通常分为三个子系统:自动火车保护(ATP),自动火车运行(ATO)和自动火车监督(ATS)。本文将展示如何使用系统安全性分析来识别ATP系统中的弱点,以及如何提高自动操作的安全性。在ATP系统上进行了故障树分析(FTA),以识别列车安全系统中的弱点。 FTA的结果表明,ATP系统的车载部分不符合“故障安全”设计标准。本文使用FTA的结果来确定可能的安全改进。然后,对Carborne ATP子系统的安全性进行重新评估,并纳入已确定的改进,以显示可实现的安全性提高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号