【24h】

PROFIT SHARING AND INTER-ORGANIZATIONAL SOFTWARE R

机译:利润共享和组织间软件研发

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Profit sharing is often seen as a way to increase the performance of inter-organizational relationships. However, in existing literature profit sharing is most often discussed in the context of supply chain of parceled goods and research remains limited in studying increasingly important area of software research and development work. When comparing software development with the development of parceled goods, there are several differences that influence inter-organizational activities. Software is difficult to determine, it is non-material, does not have physical appearance or existence, the amount of development work is difficult to estimate, the outcomes from software development are difficult to characterize, and the requirements are often unclear during the software development project. Also, the practices used during the software development project have an impact on the amount of post-project maintenance work that can account a very high percentage of the total investments in the product. All these characteristics render inter-organizational collaboration rather different from parceled goods. Profit sharing could be a good way to eliminate or minimize problems arising from the above characteristics.rnThis paper considers profit sharing in the context of software development in telecommunications industry. The study was a survey among managers working with inter-organizational software research and development collaboration between multinational companies, namely, two OEM companies and their suppliers. We had altogether 183 responses and the average response rate across the cases was 32 %. The key measurements were success and profit sharing. The respondents' experiences from "most successful" and "most unsuccessful" cases were investigated. The respondents were also asked to define the success in their own terms in order to further clarify the factors that the success consists of. For the measurement of profit sharing, the different levels of profit sharing were based on 5-level model established in existing research ranging from hourly invoiced sub-contracting to division of total profits of the end-product. In general this model ex ante assumes that the collaboration success is better with the higher levels of profit sharing than the lower ones.rnThe results of our study reveal that the definitions of collaboration success and performance differed between OEMs (original equipment manufacturers) and supplies. The results also indicate that even the partnership type of relationships are praised in the literature, they are rarely used in the software development collaboration context. In addition, we establish that the satisfaction to the level of profit sharing revealed curvilinear relationship and not linear increasing as expected, also exhibiting some differences between OEMs and suppliers. Finally, contrary to the expectations, the results show that the profit sharing is not a strong predictor of success in inter-organizational R&D. Therefore, the main results suggest that the earlier literature indicating that profit sharing is an appropriate in improving the performance of inter-organizational R&D cannot be directly transferred into the context of software development. Also the differing points of view between OEM and supplier need to be considered when considering profit sharing as a mechanism to improve inter-organizational collaborative R&D. We further outline the practical and theoretical implications of findings of the study.
机译:利润共享通常被视为提高组织间关系绩效的一种方式。但是,在现有文献中,最经常在包裹商品供应链的背景下讨论利润共享,并且在研究软件研究和开发工作中日益重要的领域方面,研究仍然受到限制。在将软件开发与包裹商品的开发进行比较时,存在一些影响组织间活动的差异。软件难以确定,非物质,没有物理外观或存在,开发工作量难以估计,软件开发的结果难以表征,需求在软件开发过程中往往不清楚项目。同样,在软件开发项目中使用的实践会对项目后维护工作量产生影响,这些工作可能占产品总投资的很大一部分。所有这些特征使得组织间的协作与包裹商品完全不同。利益共享可能是消除或最小化由上述特征引起的问题的好方法。本文考虑了电信行业软件开发中的利益共享。该研究是对从事跨国公司(即两家OEM公司及其供应商)之间的组织间软件研发合作的管理人员的调查。我们总共进行了183次回复,所有案例的平均回复率为32%。关键衡量指标是成功与利润共享。调查了“最成功”和“最不成功”案例中受访者的经历。还要求受访者以自己的方式定义成功,以便进一步阐明成功所包含的因素。对于利润共享的度量,不同级别的利润共享基于现有研究中建立的5级模型,范围从按小时开具发票的分包合同到最终产品的总利润划分。总的来说,此模型事前模型假设较高的利润分享水平比较低的利润水平更好。结果还表明,即使在文献中也赞扬了伙伴关系类型,但很少在软件开发协作环境中使用它们。此外,我们确定利润共享水平的满意度显示出曲线关系,而不是预期的线性增长,也显示出OEM与供应商之间存在一些差异。最后,与预期相反,结果表明,利润共享并不是组织间研发成功与否的强有力的预测指标。因此,主要结果表明,早期的文献指出利润共享是一种适当的方法,可以改善组织间研发的绩效,因此不能直接转移到软件开发的环境中。同样,在将利润共享作为一种改进组织间协作研发的机制时,也需要考虑OEM与​​供应商之间的不同观点。我们进一步概述了研究结果的实践意义和理论意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号