首页> 外文会议>2018 IEEE/ACM 5th International Workshop on Crowd Sourcing in Software Engineering >Do Extra Dollars Pay Off? - An Exploratory Study on TopCoder
【24h】

Do Extra Dollars Pay Off? - An Exploratory Study on TopCoder

机译:额外的美元还清吗? -TopCoder探索性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In general crowdsourcing, different task requesters employ different pricing strategies to balance task cost and expected worker performance. While most existing studies show that increasing incentives tend to benefit crowdsourcing outcomes, i.e. broader participation and higher worker performance, some reported inconsistent observations. In addition, there is the lack of investigation in the domain of software crowdsourcing. To that end, this study examines the extent to which task pricing strategies are employed in software crowdsourcing. More specifically, it aims at investigating the impact of pricing strategies on worker’s behaviors and performance. It reports a conceptual model between pricing strategies and potential influences on worker behaviors, an algorithm for measuring the effect of pricing strategies, and an empirical evaluation on 434 crowdsourcing tasks extracted from TopCoder. The results show that: 1) Strategic task pricing patterns, i.e. under-pricing and over-pricing are prevalent in software crowdsourcing practices; 2) Overpriced tasks are more likely to attract more workers to register and submit, and have higher task completion velocity; 3) Underpriced tasks tend to associate with less registrants and submissions, and lower task completion velocity. These observations imply that task requesters can typically get their extra dollars investment paid-off if employing proactive task pricing strategy. However, it is also observed that it appears to be a counter-intuitive effect on the score of final deliverable. We believe the preliminary findings are helpful for task requesters in better pricing decision and hope to stimulate further discussions and research in pricing strategies of software crowdsourcing.
机译:在一般的众包中,不同的任务请求者采用不同的定价策略来平衡任务成本和预期的员工绩效。尽管大多数现有研究表明,越来越多的激励措施倾向于使众包结果受益,即更广泛的参与和更高的工人绩效,但一些报告的观察结果不一致。另外,在软件众包领域缺乏调查。为此,本研究考察了在软件众包中采用任务定价策略的程度。更具体地说,它旨在调查定价策略对工人的行为和绩效的影响。它报告了定价策略和对员工行为的潜在影响之间的概念模型,衡量定价策略效果的算法以及对从TopCoder提取的434个众包任务的实证评估。结果表明:1)战略性任务定价模式,即定价过低和定价过高在软件众包实践中很普遍; 2)高价任务更有可能吸引更多的工人注册和提交,并且具有较高的任务完成速度; 3)定价过低的任务往往会减少注册人和提交的内容,并降低任务完成速度。这些观察结果表明,如果采用主动的任务定价策略,任务请求者通常可以得到额外的美元投资回报。但是,还观察到,这似乎对最终交付成果的得分有悖常理。我们认为,初步发现有助于任务请求者更好地制定价格决策,并希望激发有关软件众包定价策略的进一步讨论和研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号