首页> 外文会议>2018 Annual American Control Conference >Market Mechanisms for Energy Storage Planning and Operation in a Power Network
【24h】

Market Mechanisms for Energy Storage Planning and Operation in a Power Network

机译:电网储能规划和运营的市场机制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We conduct a comparative analysis on three joint market mechanisms for energy storage investment and operation under locational marginal pricing: i) socially optimal storage investment with centralized operation, ii) profit-maximizing storage investment with centralized operation, and iii) profit-maximizing storage investment with deregulated operation. For the first mechanism (according to which a social planner centrally optimizes the sitting, sizing, and operation of batteries), we show that the revenue collected from storage operation exactly covers the investment cost at a social optimum. Under the last two mechanisms, a profit maximizing firm strategically determines the sitting and sizing of batteries, and the storage operation is either centrally optimized for cost minimization (mechanism ii) or completely controlled by the storage owner for profit maximization (mechanism iii). Numerical results on the IEEE 57-bus test system reveal that under profit-maximizing investment, the centralized and deregulated storage operations usually lead to almost identical outcomes (on installed storage capacity, social cost, and storage profit).
机译:我们对三种基于市场边际定价的储能投资和运营联合市场机制进行了比较分析:i)集中运营的社会最优储能投资; ii)集中运营的利润最大化的储能投资; iii)最大化利润的储能投资放松管制。对于第一种机制(社会计划者根据该机制集中优化电池的放置,大小和操作),我们显示出从存储操作中收集的收入恰好涵盖了社会最优状态下的投资成本。在后两种机制下,利润最大化的公司从战略上确定电池的坐姿和尺寸,并且对存储操作进行集中优化以最小化成本(机制ii),或者完全由存储所有者控制以实现利润最大化(机制iii)。 IEEE 57总线测试系统的数值结果表明,在利润最大化的投资下,集中化和放松管制的存储操作通常会导致几乎相同的结果(在已安装的存储容量,社会成本和存储利润方面)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号