首页> 外文会议>2016 International Conference on Sustainable Energy Engineering and Application >Two different design methods and simulations of axial-flow hydraulic turbine runner
【24h】

Two different design methods and simulations of axial-flow hydraulic turbine runner

机译:轴流水轮机转轮的两种不同设计方法和仿真

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper discusses the runner blade design of axial-flow hydraulic turbine type propeller using two different methods. The first method is considered with no-swirl flow at runner exit, while the second method with swirl flow at runner exit. The design results show that both methods produce the different stagger angle at each blade section of the runner blade. The numerical simulation was performed using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approach to calculate the performance characteristic of the runner blade designs. Commercial software ANSYS CFX was used as CFD solver. From the operating simulation results in conditions, no-swirl flow assumption at runner exit achieved the greater power than the swirl flow assumption at runner exit. The maximum runner efficiency of swirl flow assumption at runner exit is higher than no-swirl flow assumption. However, it would be more beneficial for using the design condition that achieve the greater power in operating conditions. Thus, no-swirl flow at runner exit design assumption is recommended during the design phase of the runner blade of axial flow hydraulic turbine type propeller.
机译:本文讨论了两种不同方法的轴流式水轮机螺旋桨叶轮设计。第一种方法在流道出口处无旋流,而第二种方法在流道出口处具有旋流。设计结果表明,两种方法在转轮叶片的每个叶片部分产生不同的交错角。使用计算流体动力学(CFD)方法进行了数值模拟,以计算流道叶片设计的性能特征。商业软件ANSYS CFX被用作CFD求解器。根据一定条件下的运行模拟结果,假定流道出口处的无旋流流量要比流道出口处的旋流流量要大。流道出口处的涡流假设的最大流道效率高于无涡流假设。但是,使用在工作条件下实现更大功率的设计条件会更加有益。因此,在轴流式水力涡轮机螺旋桨的叶轮设计阶段,建议在叶轮出口设计假设时不产生旋流。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号