【24h】

A comparative life cycle analysis of plastic and paper packaging bags in the Philippines

机译:菲律宾塑料纸包装袋的生命周期比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Various cities in the Philippines have started to prohibit the use of plastic bags and packaging materials in favor of paper products for waste disposal and management reasons. This study evaluated the soundness of these initiatives based on life-cycle analysis (LCA) framework. While a number of studies have looked at similar issues in other countries, results may not be entirely valid in the Philippines due to different variations in energy and material supply chain and waste disposal practices and system. Considering the usual products being purchased by a Filipino family and the amount, 12 liter sando bags and 14 liter paper bag capacity were used as the functional units for the research. Comparison of the impact assessment was done by looking into the cradle-to-grave processes of the two bag materials. The study covered disposal to land, air and water effluents and included the global warming, acidification, ozone depletion and human toxicity impact areas. A modified EDIP was used for the life-cycle inventory and results show that out of the four impact factors, three favored the use of plastic bags. Future studies may be done on other impact factors as well as on other bag materials. This study was commissioned by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) to aid policy development in waste management in the country.
机译:菲律宾的多个城市已经开始出于废物处理和管理的原因,禁止使用塑料袋和包装材料来代替纸制品。这项研究基于生命周期分析(LCA)框架评估了这些计划的合理性。尽管许多研究都在其他国家研究了类似问题,但由于能源和材料供应链以及废物处置实践和系统的不同,在菲律宾的结果可能并不完全有效。考虑到菲律宾家庭购买的普通产品和数量,将12升的沙袋和14升的纸袋容量用作研究的功能单元。通过评估两种袋子材料从摇篮到坟墓的过程,进行了影响评估的比较。该研究涵盖了对土地,空气和水的处理,包括全球变暖,酸化,臭氧消耗和人类毒性影响领域。修改后的EDIP被用于生命周期清单,结果表明,在四个影响因素中,三个更喜欢使用塑料袋。将来可能会在其他影响因素以及其他袋子材料上进行研究。这项研究是由环境和自然资源部(DENR)委托进行的,以帮助该国废物管理方面的政策制定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号