首页> 外文会议>2015 IEEE 13th Brazilian Power Electronics Conference and 1st Southern Power Electronics Conference >Comparison of FEA field models combined with analytical method to determine the performance characteristics of high efficiency induction motors
【24h】

Comparison of FEA field models combined with analytical method to determine the performance characteristics of high efficiency induction motors

机译:FEA场模型与分析方法的比较确定高效感应电动机的性能特征

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper proposes a comparison among FEA field models combined with analytical model, in order to predict with better accuracy the NEMA/IEC performance indicators. Such indicators are the locked-rotor current, efficiency, breakdown torque and locked-rotor torque. The Stationary (S), Time-Harmonic (TH) and Time-Stepping (TS) models have been compared with different simulation features, such as: linear (L) or nonlinear (NL) magnetic material, and with or without an external circuit coupled (C) to the FEA field model (effects of stator circuit). Benchmarks have been calculated by using nameplate and manufacturer data and compared with impedance tests and the method F1 from IEEE 112/2004 to measure efficiency and the breakdown torque. Regarding both no-load and locked-rotor analyses, seven simulation tests were carried out. As result, the S model (no-load) and the NL-TH-C (locked-rotor) have the best accuracy in predicting the performance indicators NEMA/IEC.
机译:本文提出了FEA现场模型与分析模型相结合的比较,以便更好地预测NEMA / IEC性能指标。这些指标是堵转电流,效率,击穿扭矩和堵转扭矩。静态(S),时间谐波(TH)和时间步进(TS)模型已与不同的仿真功能进行了比较,例如:线性(L)或非线性(NL)磁性材料,以及是否带有外部电路(C)耦合到FEA场模型(定子电路的影响)。通过使用铭牌和制造商数据计算基准,并与阻抗测试和IEEE 112/2004的F1方法进行比较,以测量效率和击穿扭矩。关于空载和转子堵转分析,进行了七次仿真测试。结果,在预测性能指标NEMA / IEC时,S模型(空载)和NL-TH-C(堵转)具有最佳的准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号