首页> 外文会议>2014 International Conference on Power System Technology: Towards Green, Efficient and Smart Power System >Comparative analysis on the policy effects of fixed-price subsidies for renewable energy trading and quota-free market
【24h】

Comparative analysis on the policy effects of fixed-price subsidies for renewable energy trading and quota-free market

机译:固定价格补贴对可再生能源贸易和无配额市场政策效果的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

At present, China has established fixed-price subsidies and the cost-sharing system. Although this policy benefits the development of renewable energy, it is not conducive to reduce the cost of renewable energy and renewable energy consumptive. This paper analyses dynamic impact mechanism of fixed-price subsidies and quota-free market to renewable energy costs and consumptive on the basis of basic assumption quota market transactions. According to empirical analysis we find that: First, Compared with fixed price subsidies, quota market transactions can better reduce production cost of renewable energy. second, Quota trading market can better realize full acquisition of renewable energy comparing with fixed-price subsidies achieve, and can increase the social welfare.
机译:目前,中国已经建立了固定价格补贴和成本分摊制度。尽管这项政策有利于可再生能源的发展,但不利于降低可再生能源的成本和可再生能源的消耗。本文在基本假设配额市场交易的基础上,分析了固定价格补贴和无配额市场对可再生能源成本和消费的动态影响机制。通过实证分析发现:第一,与固定价格补贴相比,配额市场交易可以更好地降低可再生能源的生产成本。其次,配额交易市场与固定价格补贴相比,可以更好地实现对可再生能源的全面收购,并可以增加社会福利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号