首页> 外文会议>2014 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Science, Technology and Engineering >Ethics, law and privacy: Disentangling law from ethics in privacy discourse
【24h】

Ethics, law and privacy: Disentangling law from ethics in privacy discourse

机译:伦理,法律与隐私:在隐私话语中将法律与伦理相区别

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Numerous science, technology and engineering developments are perceived as raising privacy concerns. As such, privacy repeatedly finds itself addressed through the mixed lens of an ‘ethical-legal’ (if not ‘ethical-legal-social’) perspective. The aim of this contribution is to dispute the validity of this indistinctive approach, to stress its shortcomings, and to investigate the paths that help to disentwine ethics and law in accordance with their respective singularities and the distance between them. The paper's basic premise is that it is not possible to address the articulation between law and ethics from a neutral, un-aligned, un-attached perspective, and that, regardless of the perspective adopted to examine them, and irrespective of their many intersections, ethics and law are to remain uncoupled. The contribution illustrates how contemporary discourse on privacy can be affected by the merging of the ethical and the legal with examples taken from support of security research in the European Union (EU). Examining the limits of this viewpoint, it puts forward that legal and ethical perspectives of privacy will always remain separated by a gap, and that it is by embracing such gap, instead of attempting to erase it, that the study of privacy should be apprehended. Continuously seeking and questioning the boundaries between law and ethics is, it is suggested, perhaps the most ethical approach to enter the subject.
机译:人们认为许多科学,技术和工程学发展都引起了人们对隐私的关注。因此,隐私通过“道德-法律”(如果不是“道德-法律-社会”)的混合视角反复发现自己已得到解决。这项贡献的目的是对这种区分方法的有效性提出质疑,强调其不足之处,并根据其各自的奇异性和它们之间的距离,研究有助于消除伦理和法律的途径。该论文的基本前提是,不可能从中立,不结盟,不依恋的角度来解决法律与道德之间的清晰衔接,并且无论采用何种角度来研究法律和道德,无论它们之间有多少交叉之处,道德与法律应保持脱节。该文稿说明了道德和法律的融合如何影响当代关于隐私的论述,并举例说明了来自欧盟(EU)安全研究的支持。在检验这种观点的局限性时,提出了隐私的法律和道德观点将始终保持空白,并且应该通过拥抱这种空白而不是试图消除空白来理解隐私研究。有人建议,不断寻求和质疑法律与道德之间的界限可能是进入该学科的最符合道德的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号