首页> 外文会议>2013 16th International Multi Topic Conference >Comparative analysis of maximum power point tracking techniques for PV applications
【24h】

Comparative analysis of maximum power point tracking techniques for PV applications

机译:光伏应用最大功率点跟踪技术的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In the wake of the growing energy requirements the use of Photovoltaic (PV) systems is increasing around the world. PV systems are not linear in nature therefore special methods are used to extract the maximum available power. The non linear characteristic of the IV curve of PV module has a unique single point of maximum power. In order to operate at that power point power electronic converters are used. These power electronic converters are controlled with the help of algorithms known as Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) techniques. Various unique algorithms are found in the literature with their specific advantages and drawbacks. Keeping in view that an efficient tracking of Maximum Power Point (MPP) can increase the usability of a PV system by many folds, in this paper we present a comparison of four widely used MPPT techniques i.e 1) Fractional Short Circuit Current (FSCC), 2) Fractional Open Circuit Voltage (FOCV), 3) Perturb & Observe (P&O) and 4) Incremental Conductance (IC) MPPTs are discussed. The comparative analysis provides the pros and cons of each MPPT with a resistive load. The analysis is about the time required for each algorithm to track the maximum power and the system efficiencies.
机译:随着能源需求的增长,世界各地越来越多地使用光伏(PV)系统。光伏系统本质上不是线性的,因此使用特殊方法提取最大可用功率。 PV模块IV曲线的非线性特性具有最大功率的唯一单点。为了在该功率点上工作,使用功率电子转换器。这些功率电子转换器借助称为最大功率点跟踪(MPPT)技术的算法进行控制。在文献中发现了各种独特的算法,它们具有各自的优点和缺点。考虑到有效跟踪最大功率点(MPP)可以将光伏系统的可用性提高很多倍,在本文中,我们对四种广泛使用的MPPT技术进行了比较,即1)分数短路电流(FSCC), 2)讨论了部分开路电压(FOCV),3)扰动和观察(P&O)和4)增量电导(IC)MPPT。对比分析为每个MPPT提供了电阻负载的优缺点。该分析涉及每种算法跟踪最大功率和系统效率所需的时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号